How does a credible nominal anchor help improve the economic outcomes that result from a positive aggregate demand shock? How does a credible nominal anchor help if a negative aggregate supply shock occurs? Use graphs of aggregate supply and demand to demonstrate.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The impact of a credible nominal anchor on the economic results of a positive aggregate demand shock, as well as the impact of a credible nominal anchor on the economic consequences of a negative aggregate supply shock.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Concept of nominal credible anchor

A nominal credible anchor is a system in which a country's credibility is increased by using a fixed exchange rate with gold, silver, or another country's currency (pegging). It is a method designed to lower public expectations of future inflation increases.

02

Step 2. Explanation

The graph depicts a positive demand shock.

As can be seen in the graph above, a positive demand shock causes an increase in demand, which causes the demand curve to move rightward, causing inflation to rise in tandem with the increase in output. Without a credible nominal anchor, a positive demand shock will raise expected inflation, causing the supply curve to collapse and inflation to rise even faster as output falls. However, if there is a credible nominal anchor, expected inflation will remain stable and controlled, and the only increase will be due to the shock, not to changes in supply or public expectations.

03

Step 4. Explanation

The graph depicting a negative aggregate supply shock is as follows:

As can be seen in the graph above, a negative supply shock causes a fall in aggregate supply, which raises inflation and lowers output. Without a credible nominal anchor, projected inflation would rise, but with a credible nominal anchor, expected inflation will remain steady and controlled, and the aggregate supply curve will not shift much. As a result, with a credible nominal anchor, the supply curve will shiftless, resulting in a lower level of inflation.

As a result, the credible nominal anchor helps to reduce projected inflation and keep the rate of inflation under control.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

As part of its response to the global financial crisis, the Fed lowered the federal funds rate target to nearly zero by December 2008 and quadrupled the monetary base between 2008 and 2017, a considerable easing of monetary policy. However, survey-based measures of five- to ten-year inflation expectations remained low throughout most of this period. Comment on the Fed’s credibility in fighting inflation.

Robert Lucas won the Nobel Prize in economics. Go to http:/nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/economics/ and locate the press release on Robert Lucas. What was his Nobel Prize awarded for? When was it awarded?

Go to the St. Louis Federal Reserve FRED database, and find data on the core PCE price index (PCEPILFE) and the spot price of a barrel of oil (WTISPLC). For both variables, convert the units setting to "Percent Change from Year Ago, " and download the data from 1960 to the most recent available data.

a. Identify periods in which oil price inflation is 80%or higher.

b. In the periods identified in part (a), how many months was oil price inflation 80% or higher? What was the average core inflation rate during each of those episodes?

c. Based on your answers to parts (a) and (b) above, what can you conclude about the credibility of more recent monetary policy compared to its credibility in the earlier periods?

Suppose the central bank is following a constant-money-growth-rate rule and the economy is hit with a severe economic downturn. Use an aggregate supply and demand graph to show the possible effects on the economy. How does this situation reflect on the credibility of the central bank if it maintains the money growth rule? How does it reflect on the central bank's credibility if it abandons the money growth rule to respond to the downturn?

Suppose an econometric model based on past data predicts a small decrease in domestic investment when the Federal Reserve increases the federal funds rate. Assume the Federal Reserve is considering an increase in the federal funds rate target to fight inflation and promote a low inflation environment that will encourage investment and economic growth.

a. Discuss the implications of the econometric model’s predictions if individuals interpret the increase in the federal funds rate target as a sign that the Fed will keep inflation at low levels in the long run.

b. What would be Lucas’s critique of this model?

See all solutions

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free