If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do. A. If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do. B. Interestingly, if a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do. C. If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do personally. D. I would wisely, if a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do. E. Personally, if a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both Option A and Option E are correct.

Step by step solution

01

- Identify the Original Sentence Structure

Read the original sentence carefully: 'If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do.'
02

- Analyze the Options

Each option presents a variation of the original sentence. Find the differences in terms of content and effective communication.
03

- Check for Clarity and Correctness

Ensure that the chosen sentence conveys the intended meaning as clearly and concisely as possible without unnecessary repetition or awkward phrasing.
04

- Evaluate Option A

Option A is identical to the original sentence. It is clear and concise. 'If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do.'
05

- Evaluate Option B

Option B introduces 'Interestingly,' which is not necessary and adds no value to the clear communication of the action plan.
06

- Evaluate Option C

Option C changes the position of 'personally' to the end of the sentence, which makes the sentence structure awkward.
07

- Evaluate Option D

It is excessively wordy and disrupts the flow of the sentence by adding 'I would wisely.'
08

- Evaluate Option E

Option E changes the position of 'personally' to the front. It remains clear and appropriate, making it a valid alternative.
09

- Conclusion

Option A and Option E are both clear, concise, and grammatically correct. Choose one of them based on preference regarding the position of 'personally.'

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

sentence structure
Sentence structure is vital in ensuring that ideas are clearly communicated and easily understood. In the original sentence, the structure includes a conditional clause ('If a customer was unhappy with the service they had received') followed by the main clause ('I would personally listen to their complaint, tell them what I was going to do about it and let them know when I had done what I said I would do'). Such a structure makes it clear under what condition the actions listed in the main clause will take place. It's important to maintain a logical flow within the sentence, avoiding misplaced words that can disrupt understanding.

When analyzing sentence structure, ask yourself whether each part of the sentence logically follows from the preceding part. Consider aspects like:
  • The placement of conditional clauses
  • Whether each verb has a clear subject
  • Avoiding run-on sentences
Maintaining a logical sentence structure ensures the reader can easily follow the writer's intent.
clarity and conciseness
Clarity and conciseness are key to effective communication. Clarity ensures that the reader understands exactly what you mean, while conciseness ensures you are not using more words than necessary. In this GMAT sentence correction task, clarity is achieved by keeping the main ideas close together without inserting unnecessary words. For instance, adding words such as 'Interestingly' in Option B does not contribute to the meaning and could potentially confuse the reader.

To achieve clarity and conciseness, consider the following:
  • Remove redundant phrases
  • Avoid filler words that don't add meaning
  • Use precise language
Always ask whether each word contributes to making your meaning clearer or more succinct. If it doesn’t, it may be better to leave it out. Options A and E are good examples of being clear and concise.
grammar and syntax
Grammar and syntax are the rules that govern how we structure sentences. Proper grammar ensures the sentence is correct, while syntax involves the arrangement of words to form meaningful sentences. In the given exercise, ensuring correct grammar involves using the proper tenses and ensuring subject-verb agreement. For example, the sentence correctly uses past tense 'was' and 'had received' to match the conditional 'if' clause.

Some key points to spot correct grammar and syntax:
  • Check for proper tense usage
  • Ensure subject-verb agreement
  • Avoid misplaced modifiers
Syntax-related errors often arise from improper word order or excessive use of modifiers as seen in options C and D, which make the sentences awkward or unclear. Adhering to proper grammar and syntax rules helps in writing sentences that are both elegant and comprehensible.
evaluating options
Evaluating options involves comparing the given sentence choices to select the best one. This process includes checking for clarity, conciseness, grammar, and sentence structure, as mentioned before. In the exercise, we evaluated each option sequentially:

  • Option A: Identical to the original, straightforward and correct.
  • Option B: Unnecessary addition of 'Interestingly,' which does not add value.
  • Option C: Awkward placement of 'personally' makes the sentence less clear.
  • Option D: Excessively wordy and disrupts the sentence flow.
  • Option E: ‘Personally’ at the beginning does not impact the clarity or conciseness negatively.
While Option A and E both maintain clarity and correctness, the deciding factor could simply be the writer's preference on the position of 'personally.' Evaluating options in GMAT sentence correction involves understanding subtle differences and applying rules of grammar, syntax, clarity, and conciseness to choose the most effective sentence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For which values of \(x\) is \(x^2-2 x+3\) greater than 3 ? A. \(1>x>3\) B. None C. \(-4x>2\)

A man, a woman and a girl take 5 hours to label 1,000 packages. How long would the woman take to label 100 ? (1) The woman works \(10 \%\) faster than the man who works \(15 \%\) faster than the girl (2) The man and the girl together label 10 in 5 minutes A. 1 alone, not 2 alone B. 2 alone, not 1 alone C. 1 and 2 together (need both) D. 1 alone or 2 alone E. 1 and 2 together are not sufficient

You didn’t need to go to all that trouble, but thank you anyway it was a lovely evening. A. You didn’t need to go B. You needed gone C. You needn’t have gone Answer D. You needing to have go E. You need to go

$$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Ranked } \\ \text { Position } \\ 2005 \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { (Change } \\ \text { from } \\ 2004) \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Singapore } & 1 & (+1) \\ \hline \text { USA } & 2 & (-1) \\ \hline \text { South Korea } & 4 & (-1) \\ \hline \text { Canada } & 6 & (+2) \\ \hline \text { Mexico } & 8 & (-2) \\ \hline \text { China } & 41 & (+9) \\ \hline \text { France } & 20 & (-3) \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Information technology ranking index Which statement(s) can you infer as true? A. France in 2004 was ranked \(23 \mathrm{rd}(23-3=20)\). B. In 2004 Mexico occupied Canada's position. C. The United States and South Korea have both slipped down the index. D. In 2004 China was ranked 50th. E. Singapore has returned to the top of the index.

Her success was due to her ability to think strategically while overseeing day-today activities, and such an ability is rare indeed. A. and such an ability is B. and to do so is C. and to think strategically while overseeing day-to-day activities is D. and as such an approach is E. and her successful ability is

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free