\(\int_{0}^{\pi / 2} \frac{x d x}{1+\sin x}=\) (1) \(\operatorname{n} 2+\pi / 4\) (2) \(\ell \mathrm{n} 2-\pi / 4\) (3) \(1+\pi / 2+\ell n 2\) (4) \(\ell \mathrm{n} 2\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
\ln 2 - \frac{\pi}{4}

Step by step solution

01

- Identify the integral

We need to evaluate the integral \(\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{x \, dx}{1 + \sin x}\).
02

- Consider substitution

Let \(I = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{x \, dx}{1 + \sin x}.\) Now employ the substitution \(u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x\). This gives \(du = -dx\), and when \(x = 0\), \(u = \frac{\pi}{2}\), and when \(x = \frac{\pi}{2}\), \(u = 0\).
03

- Transform the integral

Substitute and reverse the limits of integration: \(I = \int_{\frac{\pi}{2}}^{0} \frac{(\frac{\pi}{2} - u)(-du)}{1 + \sin(\frac{\pi}{2} - u)} = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{(\frac{\pi}{2} - u) \, du}{1 + \cos u}\) because \(\sin (\frac{\pi}{2} - u) = \cos u\).
04

- Split the integral

Rewrite and split the integral: \(I = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\frac{\pi}{2} \, du}{1 + \cos u} - \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{u \, du}{1 + \cos u}\). Observe that the second integral is \(I\) itself.
05

- Simplify and solve

Let’s focus on the first integral: \(\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{\frac{\pi}{2} \, du}{1 + \cos u} = \frac{\pi}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{du}{1 + \cos u}\). To evaluate \(\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{du}{1 + \cos u}$, use the identity \(1 + \cos u = 2\cos^2(\frac{u}{2})\), which gives: $$\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{du}{1 + \cos u} = \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{du}{2\cos^2(\frac{u}{2})}\). This simplifies to \(\frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sec^2(\frac{u}{2}) d (\frac{u}{2}) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{4}} \sec^2 t \, dt\), which further simplifies to \(\frac{1}{2}[\tan t ]_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{4}} = \frac{1}{2}[1 - 0] = \frac{1}{2}\).
06

- Combine results

So, \(\frac{\pi}{2} \int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{du}{1 + \cos u} = \frac{\pi}{2} \cdot \frac{1}{2} = \frac{\pi}{4}\). Therefore, we have: \(I = \frac{\pi}{4} - I\). Solving for \(I\), get: \(2I = \frac{\pi}{4}\), hence \(I = \frac{\pi}{8}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Integration Techniques
To solve the problem, we need to use a variety of integration techniques. Initially, we encounter a definite integral with a function in the denominator that involves a trigonometric component. For such integrals, substitution often helps to simplify the integrand. In this case, substituting \(u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x\) changes the integration limits and trigonometric function, making the integral more manageable.Another technique is splitting the integral into more straightforward parts. This involves recognizing patterns or identities that let us separate the integral into parts that are easier to handle or even repeat the original integral form.
Trigonometric Substitution
Trigonometric substitution is a useful tool in integration, especially when the integral includes trigonometric functions. Substitution simplifies these functions by leveraging known identities. For instance, in our problem, the substitution \(u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x\) transforms \(\sin x\) into \(\cos u\), utilizing the identity \(\sin(\frac{\pi}{2} - u) = \cos u\).Breaking down the integral further using trigonometric identities like \(1 + \cos u = 2\cos^2(\frac{u}{2})\) simplifies the integrand even more. We then integrate using basic trigonometric integrals, such as \(\int \sec^2 t \, dt = \tan t\). This step-by-step simplification underscores how trigonometric identities and substitutions make complex integrals solvable.
Definite Integrals
Definite integrals have specific limits of integration, which provide a concrete value for the area under the curve. In our problem, we deal with the definite integral \(\int_{0}^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \frac{x \, dx}{1 + \sin x}\).After transforming the integral using substitution \(u = \frac{\pi}{2} - x\), and reversing the limits, we simplify and split the integral. Solving these parts separately—one using a simplified trigonometric identity—helps us to re-evaluate the complicated integral back to known simpler forms. Reassembling these parts and combining the results, we use algebra to solve for the unknown.This approach of breaking down the integral, using known identities, and reassembling reflects the systematic process essential for definite integrals, providing clarity and manageable steps to reach the solution.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Pure \(\mathrm{PCl}_{5}(\mathrm{~g})\) was placed in a flask at 2 atm and left for some time at a certain temp. Where the following equilibrium was established \(\mathrm{PCl}_{5}(\mathrm{~g}) \rightleftharpoons \mathrm{PCl}_{3}(\mathrm{~g})+\mathrm{Cl}_{2}(\mathrm{~g})\) Under the given condition, pure oxygen was found to effuse \(2.084\) time faster than the equilibrium mixture then \(\mathrm{K}_{\mathrm{p}}\) of the above reaction is : (1) \(\frac{2}{3}\) (2) \(\frac{3}{2}\) (3) \(\frac{4}{5}\) (4) \(\frac{5}{2}\)

For the electrons of oxygen atom, which of the following statements is correct? (1) \(Z_{\text {etl }}\) for an electron in a 2 s orbital is the same as \(\mathrm{Z}_{\text {elt }}\) for an electron in a 2p orbital. (2) An electron in the 2 s orbital has the same energy as an electron in the \(2 p\) orbital. (3) \(Z_{\text {ett }}\) for an electron in a 1 s orbital is the same as \(Z_{\text {eff }}\) for an electron in a 2 s orbital. (4) The two electrons present in the 2 s orbital have different spin quantum numbers \(\left(\mathrm{m}_{\mathrm{s}}\right)\).

The order of differential equation of family of circles passing through intersection of \(L \equiv 3 x+4 y-7=0\) and \(S \equiv x^{2}+y^{2}-2 x-2 y+1=0\) is \((1) 1\) (2) 2 (3) 3 (4) 4

A ring of mass \(\mathrm{m}\) and radius \(\mathrm{R}\) is rolling without sliding on a flat fixed horizontal surface, with a constant angular velocity. The angle between the velocity and acceleration vectors of a point \(\mathrm{P}\) on the rim of the ring at the same horizontal level as the centre of the ring may be - (1) zero (2) \(90^{\circ}\) (3) \(135^{\circ}\) (4) \(\tan ^{-1} 1 / 2\)

A man running round a race course notes that the sum of the distance of two flag - posts from him is always 10 meters and distance between the flag - posts is 8 meters. The area of the path he encloses in square meters is (1) \(15 \pi\) (2) \(12 \pi\) (3) \(18 \pi\) (4) \(8 \pi\)

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free