Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 1: Problem 13

A legal decision supporting the religious preference of a father over that of a mother might be defended plausibly by arguing that A. a father has the right to educate his children in any religion he chooses. B. a father does not have the right to choose the religion of his children. C. a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as one religion is not preferred. D. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving children's religious rights. E. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving the conflict of two different religions.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The most plausible defense for a legal decision supporting the religious preference of a father over that of a mother might be argued by maintaining that a father's religious preference may be constitutionally supported as long as one religion is not preferred (Option C).

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Options

Look through each of the options and understanding what they imply in the context of the exercise. Discard any options that do not line up with the principles of the law, constitution, safeguards of parental, and religious rights.
02

Analyzing Option A

Option A implies that a father has the absolute right to choose the religion for his children. This is fundamentally not supported by law or constitution as it neglects the rights and choices of the other parent and possibly the child itself. Therefore, this option is not plausible.
03

Analyzing Option B

Option B states the opposite, that a father does not have any right to choose the religion of his children. This is also incorrect because a father as a parent has rights in the religious upbringing of the child when done mutually with the other parent.
04

Analyzing Option C

Option C suggests that a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as it does not favor one religion over another. This seems plausible as it respects the principles of law that respect religious freedom and non-discrimination among religions. The defense could be that the religious preference in question does not promote one religion as superior.
05

Analyzing Option D

Option D implies that courts are hesitant to intervene in children's religious rights. While this holds some truth, it may not stand as a strong defense for a decision favoring a father's preference. The courts can and will intervene when necessary to protect the best interest of the child.
06

Analyzing Option E

Option E implies that courts avoid intervening in conflicts between two different religions. This is not necessarily true and cannot be used as a solid defense as courts are bound to intervene, where necessary, to protect individual and communal rights.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Supreme Court regards the truth or falsehood of religious beliefs as A. of no legal consequence. B. the primary factor that determines whether they are protected under the First Amendment. C. an issue to be determined by historical authorities. D. the basis of individual moral responsibility. E. the foundation of all legal systems.

The only team picked to win by all the sportswriters was the A. Bears B. Cowboys C. Jets D. Packers E. Redskins

In applying the best interest standard, all of the following might be considered EXCEPT: A. the length of time the parents have been married. B. any embarrassment the name might cause. C. the length of time the surname has been used by the child. D. the preservation of the child's relationship with the custodial parent. E. the preservation of the child's relationship with the noncustodial parent.

In England in 1880, the Roman Catholic father of a child born of a Baptist mother would probably have been legally allowed to do all of the following EXCEPT: A. ignore the child's religious education. B. bring up the child as a Roman Catholic. C. bring up the child as a Baptist. D. make sure that the child was brought up very religiously. E. abrogate his authority without reason.

When the passage refers to awarding custody of the children to the mother and requiring child support from the father with retaining of his name as the result of "sex-discriminatory presumptions" (line 47), it alludes to the belief of all the following EXCEPT: A. Child raising is the province of the female. B. Wage earning is the province of the male. C. The male family name has precedence over the female. D. Trading the use of the father's name for child support is acceptable. E. Women can earn more than men.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Text Comparison

Read Explanation

Summary Text

Read Explanation

Blog

Read Explanation

Single Paragraph Essay

Read Explanation

History of English Language

Read Explanation

Creative Story

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free