A legal decision supporting the religious preference of a father over that of a mother might be defended plausibly by arguing that A. a father has the right to educate his children in any religion he chooses. B. a father does not have the right to choose the religion of his children. C. a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as one religion is not preferred. D. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving children's religious rights. E. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving the conflict of two different religions.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The most plausible argument in defense of a legal decision supporting the father's religious preference over the mother's might be Choice C: a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as one religion is not preferred. This choice allows for the preference without signaling partiality towards a specific religion.

Step by step solution

01

Analyze the Choices

Read each choice carefully. Eliminate the choices that clearly violate individual rights or legal principles, such as those that give unilateral religious rights to a father over a mother (Choice A) or take away his rights (Choice B).
02

Consider the Legal Principles

Considering the implication of constitutionality in Choice C, a constitutional preference can be given without indicating partiality towards any one religion.
03

Interpret the Courts' Reluctance

Choices D and E both refer to the courts' reluctance to intervene. While D refers to children's religious rights, E speaks to conflicts between two religions. However, these choices do not proactively defend the religious preference of a father over a mother.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If, according to the author, a party in an arbitration believes that its award, though honest, was incorrectly determined, it A. may appeal the settlement to another arbitrator. B. may appeal the settlement to a court of law. C. may seek redress through a compromise settlement. D. may reverse the decision through due process. E. has no recourse, since the decision is final.

In Africa, the age of a juvenile delinquent is A. the same in all the countries. B. between the ages of 8 and 21 years. C. between the ages of 7 and 21 years. D. between the ages of 12 and 21 years. E. different from one country to another.

Which of the following most logically completes the passage at the blank below? The English language, lacking the rigidity of most European tongues, has been bent and shaped in at least as many ways as there are countries or regions where it is spoken. Though purists often argue that "standard" English is spoken only in certain highminded enclaves of the American northeast, the fact is that it is the most widely used language in the world and is not likely to yield that distinction for a very long time, if ever. Nevertheless, A. it remains one of the most widely spoken languages throughout the world B. it can be understood in just about every corner of the globe C. even making allowances for regional peculiarities, English as it is spoken has been much abused in recent times D. though we may be proud of these facts, English remains one of the most difficult languages to master E. English, as it is spoken, lacks the rigidity of the classical and more historic European languages

The following letter was sent to a candidate applying for entrance to Nathford University. Thank you for your interest in Nathford University. We regret to say that your application for entrance has been rejected. Unfortunately, because of the unusually high number of candidates this year, we were not even able to accept all those with SAT scores of 1000 or above, as has been our practice in the past. We have only a limited number of openings and must accept entering students accordingly. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the letter? A. The student receiving the letter had SAT scores of 1000 or above. B. The student receiving the letter did not have SAT scores of 1000 or above. C. Nathford University accepted only those students with SAT scores of 1000 or above. D. Nathford University rejected many students with SAT scores of 1000 or above. E. Nathford University had constraints other than SAT scores that affected selection of candidates.

Of all the petty little pieces of bureaucratic arrogance, it's hard to imagine one smaller than that of the city schools in not admitting a British subject whose father is working-as a legal alien-for a nearby petrochemical company. Someone apparently decided that if the boy had been an illegal alien, a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a Texas case would have required the district to admit him, but since he is legal, there is no such requirement. That is nonsense. Which of the following best expresses the point of the author's argument? A. The city schools outside Texas should not base decisions on a precedent set in Texas. B. The stability of a parent's job should have no bearing on the educational opportunity offered his or her child. C. Bureaucratic arrogance has resulted in unsound legal interpretation. D. Legal sense and nonsense are sometimes indistinguishable. E. Both legal and illegal aliens should receive equal treatment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free