The \(\$ 464\) million "reserve" in the 2001-2002 budget adopted by the legislature in June turns out to have been based mainly on wishful thinking. Because of tax cuts approved by voters on the June ballot, along with the continuing recession and other events affecting income and expenses, the actual reserve in prospect may be as low as \(\$ 7\) million. The author is probably leading to which of the following conclusions? A. These facts warrant an investigation into who squandered \(\$ 457\) million. B. A reserve in the budget is not so necessary as we might wish it to be. C. The legislature would be wise not to add any new spending to the budget adopted in June. D. The recession will probably not last much longer, but while it does the legislature must adjust the budget accordingly. E. Legislative budgets are typically careless and unheeding of variable factors that may affect their accuracy.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct conclusion the author is leading to is C: The legislature would be wise not to add any new spending to the budget adopted in June.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the passage

The passage tells us about a budget reserve, which was initially thought to be \$464 million but due to various factors like tax cuts, the recession, etc., the actual reserve might be as low as \$7 million.
02

Analyze the options

Look at each option and check if it is a sensible conclusion to draw from the information given in the passage. A conclusion must directly follow from the premises provided.
03

Eliminate irrelevant or unsupported options

Options A and E involve blaming somebody or making judgments that aren't supported by the passage. Option B implies that reserves aren't important, which isn't suggested by the passage. Option D refers to the end of the recession, which isn't part of the passage either.
04

Choose the best fit

Option C is the only one remaining and also makes sense in context. Given that the reserve might be lower than expected, it would be wise for the legislature not to add any new spending to the budget.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Verdex Code for Plumbers states that before beginning repair work on a sewage line in a house, the incoming water valve must be turned off. However, if the house uses a septic tank instead of city sewage, the Verdex Code is superseded by an older code (called the Stipex Code) that allows incoming water to be either off or on. In either case, the rule for turning incoming water off does not apply when working on commercial property. If the statements above are true, which of the following statements must also be true? A. The Verdex Code is widely observed by professional plumbers. B. Plumbers working on commercial property must turn the incoming water supply off. C. Plumbers must turn the incoming water supply off when working on houses with septic tanks. D. Incoming water is considered potable, whereas sewage water is nonpotable. E. The Stipex Code does not apply to houses connected to city sewage systems.

Of all the petty little pieces of bureaucratic arrogance, it's hard to imagine one smaller than that of the city schools in not admitting a British subject whose father is working-as a legal alien-for a nearby petrochemical company. Someone apparently decided that if the boy had been an illegal alien, a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in a Texas case would have required the district to admit him, but since he is legal, there is no such requirement. That is nonsense. Which of the following best expresses the point of the author's argument? A. The city schools outside Texas should not base decisions on a precedent set in Texas. B. The stability of a parent's job should have no bearing on the educational opportunity offered his or her child. C. Bureaucratic arrogance has resulted in unsound legal interpretation. D. Legal sense and nonsense are sometimes indistinguishable. E. Both legal and illegal aliens should receive equal treatment.

It can be inferred that the author would probably consider arbitration similar to litigation in that in both instances A. many disputes are ultimately settled by the parties themselves. B. judgment is rendered by a specialist from the parties' own field. C. an impartial decision is reached that is binding and final. D. traditional rules of evidence bind both parties. E. procedures often become time consuming and expensive.

Which one of the following arguments can be used to support one of the most used reasons for children's retention of the father's name-preservation of the parent-child relationship? A. Either parent will maintain contact regardless of the child's last name. B. A system capable of dealing with name changes of divorced mothers ought to be able to deal as well with children's name changes. C. A bureaucratic convenience should not be set above preserving the parent- child relationship. D. A father is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from his own. E. A mother is less likely to maintain contact with a child whose name differs from her own.

When President Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act in 1965, he used fifty pens, handing them out as souvenirs to a joyous gathering in the President's Room of the Capitol, where Abraham Lincoln had signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863. When President Reagan signed an extension of the Voting Rights Act in 1982, he spoke affectionately of the "right to vote," signed with a single pen, then concluded the four-minute ceremony by rising from his desk, announcing, "It's done." If the passage above is true, which of the following is most probably true? A. The Voting Rights Act did not require an extension. B. The Voting Rights Act is not significantly related to the Emancipation Proclamation. C. President Reagan saw himself as more like Lincoln than did Johnson. D. President Reagan did not regard the extension of the act as an occasion for fanfare. E. President Reagan objected strenuously to an extension of the Voting Rights Act.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free