. The $464 million “reserve” in the 2001–2002 budget adopted by the legislature in June turns out to have been based mainly on wishful thinking. Because of tax cuts approved by voters on the June ballot, along with the continuing recession and other events affecting income and expenses, the actual reserve in prospect may be as low as $7 million. The author is probably leading to which of the following conclusions? A. These facts warrant an investigation into who squandered $457 million. B. A reserve in the budget is not so necessary as we might wish it to be. C. The legislature would be wise not to add any new spending to the budget adopted in June. D. The recession will probably not last much longer, but while it does the legislature must adjust the budget accordingly. E. Legislative budgets are typically careless and unheeding of variable factors that may affect their accuracy.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The author is most likely leading to conclusion C: 'The legislature would be wise not to add any new spending to the budget adopted in June.'

Step by step solution

01

Identify key points

Read the passage and understand the key points: The initial reserve was $464 million. However, due to factors such as tax cuts, a recession, and other unnamed events, the prospective reserve has significantly dropped, potentially down to $7 million.
02

Analyze the multiple choice options

Review each of the multiple choice conclusions (options A-E) and consider which best fits with the author's implied argument or conclusion from the text.
03

Select the right answer

Option C: 'The legislature would be wise not to add any new spending to the budget adopted in June.' appears to be the conclusion most closely related to the author's argument. The author discusses the significant reduction of the reserve due to various factors, which suggests caution for future financial decisions, such as adding new spending.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In the eighteenth century, the execution of a pregnant woman sentenced to death for a crime would be delayed if the A. Woman was in an early stage of pregnancy. B. woman had minor children wholly dependent upon her. C. legal father of the unborn child requested a delay. D. woman was in the sixth month of her pregnancy. E. unborn child had begun to move.

Assume that firms develop an orangeflavored breakfast drink high in vitamin \(\mathrm{C}\) that is a good substitute for orange juice but sells for less. Based upon assertions in the passage, which of the following would occur with respect to the demand for orange juice? A. Health food stores would resurrect the law of diminishing marginal utility. B. Assuming that the price of fresh orange juice remained constant, more orange juice would be consumed. C. The law of demand would prevail. D. Assuming that the price of fresh orange juice remained constant, the demand would not change. E. There is not enough information in the passage to answer this question.

The author's statement might be weakened by pointing out that A. eight hours of sleep is a cultural, not a physical, requirement. B. the most capable people rarely sleep. C. rest is a positive contribution to knowledge and capability. D. young children enjoy themselves less than knowledgeable adults. E. people rarely waste time during their waking hours.

If, according to the author, a party in an arbitration believes that its award, though honest, was incorrectly determined, it A. may appeal the settlement to another arbitrator. B. may appeal the settlement to a court of law. C. may seek redress through a compromise settlement. D. may reverse the decision through due process. E. has no recourse, since the decision is final.

The following letter was sent to a candidate applying for entrance to Nathford University. Thank you for your interest in Nathford University. We regret to say that your application for entrance has been rejected. Unfortunately, because of the unusually high number of candidates this year, we were not even able to accept all those with SAT scores of 1000 or above, as has been our practice in the past. We have only a limited number of openings and must accept entering students accordingly. Which of the following can be validly concluded from the letter? A. The student receiving the letter had SAT scores of 1000 or above. B. The student receiving the letter did not have SAT scores of 1000 or above. C. Nathford University accepted only those students with SAT scores of 1000 or above. D. Nathford University rejected many students with SAT scores of 1000 or above. E. Nathford University had constraints other than SAT scores that affected selection of candidates.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free