Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 2: Problem 3

When President Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act in 1965, he used fifty pens, handing them out as souvenirs to a joyous gathering in the President's Room of the Capitol, where Abraham Lincoln had signed the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863. When President Reagan signed an extension of the Voting Rights Act in 1982, he spoke affectionately of the "right to vote," signed with a single pen, then concluded the four-minute ceremony by rising from his desk, announcing, "It's done." If the passage above is true, which of the following is most probably true? A. The Voting Rights Act did not require an extension. B. The Voting Rights Act is not significantly related to the Emancipation Proclamation. C. President Reagan saw himself as more like Lincoln than did Johnson. D. President Reagan did not regard the extension of the act as an occasion for fanfare. E. President Reagan objected strenuously to an extension of the Voting Rights Act.

Short Answer

Expert verified
D. President Reagan did not regard the extension of the act as an occasion for fanfare.

Step by step solution

01

Reading the passage carefully

The passage talks about how two different Presidents, Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan, handled the signing of the Voting Rights Act and its extension. Johnson signed the act with fanfare, while Reagan did it with less pomp and pageantry.
02

Analysing the choices

Now it's time to analyse each choice one by one. Compare the statement given with what has been inferred from the reading: \n\nA. The passage implies nothing about the need for an extension of the Voting Rights Act. So this can't be the answer. \n\nB. The passage does not make any explicit connections or comparisons between the Voting Rights Act and the Emancipation Proclamation; it merely states that both events occurred in the same venue. \n\nC. This statement is purely speculative and is not suggested or inferred anywhere in the passage. \n\nD. This statement aligns with what we have inferred from the text. Reagan signed the bill without extraneous ceremony, suggesting a lack of a desire for fanfare. \n\nE. This statement is contradicted by the text as Reagan signed the extension, so he did not object malevolently to it.
03

Making a conclusion

After analysing each choice, it would appear that choice D is the most correct. It captures the contrast between Johnson’s ceremony filled with display and Reagan's modest ceremony when extending the same act.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

It can be inferred that the author would probably consider arbitration similar to litigation in that in both instances A. many disputes are ultimately settled by the parties themselves. B. judgment is rendered by a specialist from the parties' own field. C. an impartial decision is reached that is binding and final. D. traditional rules of evidence bind both parties. E. procedures often become time consuming and expensive.

By appropriating bailout money for the depressed housing industry, Congress is opening the door to a flood of special relief programs for other recessionaffected businesses. The author's attitude toward Congress's action is probably A. neutral. B. disapproving. C. confused. D. happy. E. irate.

College student: Whenever I need to study but feel sleepy, all I do is take a few of those caffeine pills, and I'm completely awake. According to the label, these pills are perfectly safe to use, since I could get the same amount of energizing caffeine by drinking a few cups of coffee. Which of the following statements weakens the argument expressed by the student? A. Pills that can help prevent drowsiness often contain caffeine, a natural substance that can increase "awakenesss" and provide the user with a sudden boost of energy. B. Since caffeine is a natural substance found in many common foods such as chocolate, pills that are caffeinebased may be just as safe. C. One subconsciously limits intake of caffeine through its method of intake; for example, most people can drink only a few cups of coffee before they feel full. D. Many students tend to pull "all nighters" in school, and caffeine pills are an ideal way to reduce drowsiness and study through the night. E. In the last decade, many pharmaceutical companies have released caffeine- based pills that have been widely sold over the counter in drugstores.

The argument that a child of divorced parents by keeping the parental name may be given a "healthy sense of family" (line 38), "ethnic and religious identity" (lines 38-39), and a "rightful link with an absent ... father" (line 40) is based upon all of the following doubtful assumptions EXCEPT: A. Ethnic identity is determined by the father. B. Religious identity is determined by the father. C. Record keeping systems cannot handle changes of names. D. A father's name gives a sense of family. E. A link to an absent father should be maintained.

The Verdex Code for Plumbers states that before beginning repair work on a sewage line in a house, the incoming water valve must be turned off. However, if the house uses a septic tank instead of city sewage, the Verdex Code is superseded by an older code (called the Stipex Code) that allows incoming water to be either off or on. In either case, the rule for turning incoming water off does not apply when working on commercial property. If the statements above are true, which of the following statements must also be true? A. The Verdex Code is widely observed by professional plumbers. B. Plumbers working on commercial property must turn the incoming water supply off. C. Plumbers must turn the incoming water supply off when working on houses with septic tanks. D. Incoming water is considered potable, whereas sewage water is nonpotable. E. The Stipex Code does not apply to houses connected to city sewage systems.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

Summary Text

Read Explanation

Blog

Read Explanation

Cues and Conventions

Read Explanation

Free Response Essay

Read Explanation

Single Paragraph Essay

Read Explanation

Language and Social Groups

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free