Political columnist: Money talks as never before in state and local elections, and the main cause is.TV advertising. Thirty seconds can go for as much as \(\$ 20,000\). Political fundraising is one of the few growth industries left in America. The way to stop the waste might be for television to be paid by state and local government, at a standard rate, to provide airtime to all candidates to debate the issues. This might be boring at first, but eventually candidates might actually brush up their debating skills and electrify the TV audience with content, not style. Which of the following presuppositions is necessary to the political columnist's argument above? A. Candidates do not yet spend too much money on television advertising. B. Television is the most effective medium to reach the public. C. Freedom of speech does not abridge the freedom to spend. D. Television can be used to educate and inform the public. E. The television audience desires exciting political candidates.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The necessary presupposition to the political columnist's argument is option D: Television can be used to educate and inform the public.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the argument

The political columnist's argument is that TV advertising is the main cause of increased costs in state and local elections because of high advertising costs. Consequently, he suggests that to stop wastage, TV should be paid by state and local government at a regular rate to give all candidates time to debate the issues.
02

Evaluate each option

Go through each option, A - E, and evaluate each one according to the columnist's argument.
03

Assess Option A

Option A 'Candidates do not yet spend too much money on television advertising'. This option however contradicts the columnist's argument as he clearly states the excessive spending on TV ads.
04

Assess Option B

Option B 'Television is the most effective medium to reach the public'. This option is important for the argument, but not necessary. The columnist doesn't necessarily say TV is the most effective, just that it's currently the most costly.
05

Assess Option C

Option C 'Freedom of speech does not abridge the freedom to spend'. Freedom of speech is not directly addressed in the columnist's argument, so this is not a necessary presupposition.
06

Assess Option D

Option D 'Television can be used to educate and inform the public'. This is a necessary presupposition based on the columnist's view that TV should give candidates time to debate issues, thereby being a tool for education and information.
07

Assess Option E

Option E 'The television audience desires exciting political candidates'. This is not a necessary presupposition for the columnist's argument. He does suggest candidates might eventually electrify audiences, but it is not necessary to his core argument.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Don't spend the night tossing and turning! Take Eezy-Z's for a sound, restful sleep ... you'll wake up refreshed, energized, with no druggedup hangover. Remember ... Eezy-Z's when you need that sleep! Which of the following is NOT a claim of Eezy-Z's? A. A good night's sleep B. Added energy C. No aftereffects D. Quickly falling asleep E. A restful slumber

A legal decision supporting the religious preference of a father over that of a mother might be defended plausibly by arguing that A. a father has the right to educate his children in any religion he chooses. B. a father does not have the right to choose the religion of his children. C. a father's religious preference may be supported constitutionally as long as one religion is not preferred. D. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving children's religious rights. E. the courts are reluctant to intervene in cases involving the conflict of two different religions.

If, according to the author, a party in an arbitration believes that its award, though honest, was incorrectly determined, it A. may appeal the settlement to another arbitrator. B. may appeal the settlement to a court of law. C. may seek redress through a compromise settlement. D. may reverse the decision through due process. E. has no recourse, since the decision is final.

By appropriating bailout money for the depressed housing industry, Congress is opening the door to a flood of special relief programs for other recessionaffected businesses. The author's attitude toward Congress's action is probably A. neutral. B. disapproving. C. confused. D. happy. E. irate.

The argument that a child of divorced parents by keeping the parental name may be given a "healthy sense of family" (line 38), "ethnic and religious identity" (lines 38-39), and a "rightful link with an absent ... father" (line 40) is based upon all of the following doubtful assumptions EXCEPT: A. Ethnic identity is determined by the father. B. Religious identity is determined by the father. C. Record keeping systems cannot handle changes of names. D. A father's name gives a sense of family. E. A link to an absent father should be maintained.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free