Traveling at approximately \(186,000\) miles per second, about how many miles does a beam of light travel in 2 hours? F. \(3.72 \times 10^{5}\) G. \(2.23 \times 10^{6}\) H. \(2.68 \times 10^{7}\) J. \(6.70 \times 10^{8}\) K. \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Choose the closest answer among the given options. Options: F: \(3.72 \times 10^{5}\) G: \(2.23 \times 10^{6}\) H: \(2.68 \times 10^{7}\) J: \(6.70 \times 10^{8}\) K: \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\) Answer: K: \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\)

Step by step solution

01

Convert the time given (2 hours) to seconds

To convert the time into seconds, we need to multiply the number of hours by 60 for minutes and then 60 again for seconds. Therefore, the conversion is: 2 hours × 60 minutes/hour × 60 seconds/minute = 7200 seconds
02

Calculate the distance traveled by light using the given speed and the converted time

Now we will use the speed-distance-time relationship to calculate the distance traveled by light. The formula is: distance = speed × time distance = (186,000 miles/second) × 7200 seconds The seconds (time) unit gets canceled out, giving us the distance in miles. distance = \(186,000 \times 7200\) miles Now let's calculate the total distance: distance = \(1,336,000,000\) miles
03

Comparing the calculated distance to the given options

Now we need to compare the calculated distance of \(1,336,000,000\) miles to the provided options. F: \(3.72 \times 10^{5}\) G: \(2.23 \times 10^{6}\) H: \(2.68 \times 10^{7}\) J: \(6.70 \times 10^{8}\) K: \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\) The closest answer to our calculated distance is \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\) miles. Thus, the answer is: K: \(1.34 \times 10^{9}\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Physics Problem Solving
Physics problem solving is a systematic process of understanding and applying physical concepts to find solutions to real-world problems. When faced with a physics problem, such as calculating the distance light travels in a certain period, it is crucial to break down the problem into manageable steps.

First, identify the given data and the physical principles that apply, such as the constant speed of light. Next, determine what needs to be found—in our case, the total distance. Finally, translate this into a mathematical equation or set of equations that can be solved step by step. Critical thinking and a firm grasp of concepts such as units of measurement, conversion factors, and constants are essential components of successful physics problem solving.
Speed-Distance-Time Relationship
Understanding the relationship between speed, distance, and time is an essential component of many physics problems, including those concerning travel and motion. The fundamental equation connecting these three variables is:
\[ \text{distance} = \text{speed} \times \text{time} \]

For example, when determining the distance a beam of light travels over a specific duration, one would multiply the speed of light (approximately \(186,000\) miles per second) by the total time the light is in motion. Using these precise measurements is necessary to achieve an accurate result. Each variable in this equation is interdependent, which means that if two are known, the third can be calculated.
Scientific Notation
Scientific notation is a way to express very large or very small numbers conveniently, which is particularly useful in fields like physics. It involves writing a number as a product of a decimal number greater than or equal to 1 and less than 10, and a power of 10. For example, the number \(1,336,000,000\) can be daunting to read, but in scientific notation, it becomes \(1.336 \times 10^9\), which is far easier to interpret and work with.

In the light speed calculation problem, the solution utilizes scientific notation to compare the calculated distance to the provided answers. This notation simplifies calculations and aids in understanding and communicating very large values, like the distances light can travel in vast, empty spaces such as outer space.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Both scientists would most likely agree that the ocean water was, or became, oxygen-poor when which of the following events occurred? F. Ocean water circulation reversed its usual direction. G. Ocean water circulation slowed, stopped, or was absent. H. Oceanic organisms dramatically increased the available oxygen in the ocean water. J. Oceanic organisms used up all the available \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) in the ocean water.

If the inequality \(|a|>|b|\) is true, then which of the following \(m u s t\) be true? A. \(a=b\) B. \(a \neq b\) C. \(ab\) E. \(a>0\)

What are the values for \(x\) that satisfy the equation \((x+a)(x+b)=0 ?\) F. \(-a\) and \(-b\) G. \(-a\) and \(b\) H. \(-a b\) J. \(a\) and \(-b\) K. \(a\) and \(b\)

When Jeff starts a math assignment, he spends 5 minutes getting out his book and a sheet of paper, sharpening his pencil, looking up the assignment in his assignment notebook, and turning to the correct page in his book. The equation \(t=10 p+5\) models the time, \(t\) minutes, Jeff budgets for a math assignment with \(p\) problems. Which of the following statements is necessarily true according to Jeff's model? F. He budgets 15 minutes per problem. G. He budgets 10 minutes per problem. H. He budgets 5 minutes per problem. J. He budgets 10 minutes per problem for the hard problems and 5 minutes per problem for the easy problems. K. He budgets a 5 -minute break after each problem.

According to Studies 2 and \(3,100,000\) years of ice accumulation was represented by a 500 \(\mathrm{m}\) core in the Arctic and a 300 \(\mathrm{m}\) core in the Antarctic. Which of the following statements best explains why the ice cores were different lengths? The average rate of glacial ice accumulation over that time period in the Arctic: A. was greater than the rate in the Antarctic. B. was the same as the rate in the Antarctic. C. was less than the rate in the Antarctic. D. could not be determined with any accuracy.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free