Chapter 15: Problem 1
Mention the main differences between an oil refinery and a biorefinery.
Short Answer
Step by step solution
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Chapter 15: Problem 1
Mention the main differences between an oil refinery and a biorefinery.
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeA catalytic cracking unit in an oil refinery produces the so-called amylenes that can be dehydrogenated (abstraction of hydrogen). Which product is formed? Is there a simple biomass-derived process possible to produce the same chemical?
Why would lignin valorization to high added value products in newly established modern biorefineries be rather a necessity than just an option?
A biorefinery process called "Biofine" has been presented in the recent past (Kamm and Kamm, 2004). It is a biomass-based process route making use of acid hydrolysis and dehydration subprocesses and esterification with ethanol to ethyl levulinate (EL) (an ester of levulinic acid and ethanol). By-products considered are power and formic acid (FA). The production of EL is \(133 \mathrm{kt}\). year \(^{-1}\). The capital cost is 150 million US\$ (consider linear depreciation in 10 years). Table \(15.8\) gives an overview of the prices of the raw materials and by-products. In addition, the water supply costs are US\$ 500,000/year. Regarding labor, there are 17 operators per shift working at a salary of US\$ \(20 / \mathrm{h}\) and two supervisors per shift working at a salary of US\$ \(24 / \mathrm{h}\). Assume an ROI of \(15 \%\). For other costs, take the guidelines given in this chapter (Table 15.6). a. Calculate the cost and return price in US $\$$ per tonne EL produced. b. What is the price in US \$ per GJ HHV? (hint: calculate the heat of combustion of EL). c. Is it possible to produce the required ethanol in the process itself? TABLE 15.8 Overview of costs, yields of by-products, and material amounts for the "Biofine"' process $$ \begin{array}{lll} \text { Raw material/utility/by-product } &{\text { Amount }} & \text { Price in US\$ } \\ \hline \text { Feedstock } & 350 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 40 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Sulfuric acid } & 3.5 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 100 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Caustic soda } & 0.5 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 120 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Ethanol } & 35 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \text { year }^{-1} & 350 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Hydrogen } & 0.12 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 1500 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Ash disposal } & 17.5 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 35 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \text { Power exported } & 3.1 \mathrm{MW} & 60 \mathrm{MWh}^{-1} \\ \text { Formic acid sold } & 38.5 \mathrm{kt} \cdot \mathrm{year}^{-1} & 110 \cdot \mathrm{t}^{-1} \\ \hline \end{array} $$
Set up two process schemes for the production of ethanol from wood, one based on a thermochemical platform and the other based on a biochemical platform. What are advantages and disadvantages of both schemes?
Gonzalez et al. (2012) report on the cost of different types of equipment in a biorefinery concept for cellulosic ethanol production using gasification. What is the explanation for investment scale factors smaller than one? What is the explanation for scale factors larger than one? In case of a huge scale factor, what would you propose?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.