Chapter 6: Problem 5
Is it possible to find a non-isothermal steady-state continuous stirred tank reactor and a non-isothermal steady-state plug flow reactor?
Chapter 6: Problem 5
Is it possible to find a non-isothermal steady-state continuous stirred tank reactor and a non-isothermal steady-state plug flow reactor?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeIn Example \(6.5\), the conversion for the plug flow reactor is \(0.69\), whereas for the tubular reactor with RTD, it is \(0.67\). Would it be possible to find the opposite: a lower conversion in the plug flow reactor?
Consider an exothermic reaction carried out in a jacketed batch reactor. The cooling flow is connected to a feedback control loop programmed to create the following temperature ramp inside the reactor: \(\mathrm{T}=a \cdot \mathrm{t}+b\). Is it necessary to simultaneously solve the energy and the molar balances in the reactor?
Compare Equations (6.22) and (6.29). Assuming a first-order reaction and the same operation conditions, which reactor needs less volume to obtain the same conversion, the CSTR or the PFR? Why?
Assume a BR and a PFR with the same residence time. Which one gives a higher conversion? Why?
A chemical plant accidentally discharges a pollutant A into a river. Fortunately, A degrades in time. Calculate how far from the plant the concentration of the pollutant has decreased by \(90 \%\). What is the best reactor model for this problem? What is the kinetic order for this reaction? Data Reaction rate coefficient \(\mathrm{k}=0.0008 \mathrm{~mol}^{0.5} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{1.5} \cdot \mathrm{min}^{-1}\) River flow \(\varphi_{V}=200 \mathrm{~m}^{3} \cdot \mathrm{s}^{-1}\) Cross section of the river \(S=300 \mathrm{~m}^{2}\) Concentration of \(\mathrm{A}\) in the plant \(\mathrm{c}_{\mathrm{A} 0}=0.02 \mathrm{~mol} \cdot \mathrm{m}^{-3}\)
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.