Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 8: Problem 18

Describe the pros and cons of direct drying using flue gas and steam.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Direct drying using flue gas is energy efficient and cost-effective by recovering waste heat from combustion processes. However, it may contribute to air pollution due to harmful pollutants and cause corrosion to machinery. On the other hand, steam provides a clean and consistent heat transfer over a broad temperature range, making it environmentally friendly. Nonetheless, it has higher energy consumption and a risk of condensation, which may lead to uneven drying and potential damage to the material.

Step by step solution

01

Introduction

To begin the analysis, it's necessary to understand what direct drying is and how flue gas and steam are used in this process. Direct drying is a process where the material being dried comes in direct contact with a stream of heated gas, in this case, either fluke gas or steam.
02

Direct Drying using Flue Gas: Pros

Flue gas is the exhaust gas generated during combustion processes. Using flue gas for direct drying offers a few advantages: 1. Energy efficiency: Drying with flue gas recovers the waste heat produced during combustion, reducing energy waste and overall energy consumption. 2. Cost-effective: Utilizing waste flue gas for drying purposes can result in lower energy costs because of the repurposing of otherwise lost energy.
03

Direct Drying using Flue Gas: Cons

Despite its advantages, flue gas also has a few drawbacks when used for direct drying: 1. Air pollution: Flue gas contains harmful pollutants, like sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. If not properly treated before use, the drying process can inadvertently cause environmental harm. 2. Corrosion: High levels of sulfur and other corrosive chemicals in flue gas can damage machinery and materials, requiring regular maintenance and vigilance on equipment.
04

Direct Drying using Steam: Pros

Steam is another option for direct drying, and it comes with its own set of advantages: 1. Clean process: Steam does not contain harmful pollutants, eliminating the risk of air pollution and making steam-based direct drying an environmentally friendly choice. 2. Consistent heat transfer: Steam provides a steady stream of heat, ensuring a uniform drying process. 3. Broad temperature range: With proper equipment, steam can be used in a wide range of temperatures, making it suitable for various drying applications.
05

Direct Drying using Steam: Cons

However, steam is not without its drawbacks: 1. Energy consumption: Generating steam requires a source of energy, such as the use of a boiler, that may result in higher energy costs when compared to using waste flue gas. 2. Risk of condensation: During the steam drying process, steam can condense on the drying surface, leading to an uneven drying process and causing potential damage to the material being dried. Overall, both flue gas and steam come with their respective pros and cons when used for direct drying. The choice between these two options depends on the specific application and goals, along with a careful consideration of the environmental impact, energy efficiency, and cost-effectiveness.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In practice, is screening always needed for biomass processing?

What are limits in the application of mechanical dewatering of biomass?

A community intends to use their sewage waste (using urine separation) to derive energy from it. The material is very wet, however, and even with urine separation, only about \(29 \mathrm{wt} \%\) dry matter can be obtained. About 700 households produce \(125 \mathrm{~kg}\). day \({ }^{-1}\) of feces matter, and the combustion process that is to be applied requires 80 wt \(\%\) dry matter material. a. How much water must be removed per second in a continuous process? b. In case no heat losses occur, what would be the energy needed for this drying process? Neglect the heating up of the feces, but only consider the water heat up and evaporation at atmospheric conditions. c. Would the assumption in (b) lead to a large difference in the calculated heat supply?

Is microwave heating an economically viable option for large-scale drying of biomass for heating purposes?

What is accomplished by biomass washing? For which types of biomass do you think this is relevant? List advantages and disadvantages of washing as a pretreatment technique.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

Environmental Research

Read Explanation

Sustainability

Read Explanation

Physical Environment

Read Explanation

Ecological Conservation

Read Explanation

Living Environment

Read Explanation

Environmental Policy

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free