Chapter 9: Problem 10

Why are small populations more susceptible to extinction from demographic stochasticity than are larger populations?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Answer: Smaller populations are more susceptible to extinction due to demographic stochasticity because random fluctuations in their population size have a greater proportional impact than in larger populations, making them more vulnerable to significant declines. Additionally, smaller populations are more likely to experience reduced genetic diversity due to random genetic drift, which can compromise their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions and further increase their risk of extinction. On the contrary, larger populations can better buffer against such random fluctuations and are less likely to go extinct due to demographic stochasticity.

Step by step solution

Understanding Demographic Stochasticity

Demographic stochasticity refers to the random fluctuations in population size due to birth and death rates as well as immigration and emigration. These fluctuations can cause a population to grow or shrink over time, and in some cases even lead to extinction. The effects of demographic stochasticity are more pronounced in smaller populations.

Effects of Demographic Stochasticity on Small Populations

In small populations, demographic stochasticity can have a significant impact because even a small change in the number of individuals can represent a large proportion of the entire population. For example, if a population of 10 individuals loses two members, it represents a 20% decline. These fluctuations can result in a higher likelihood of extinction. Furthermore, a small population is more likely to lose genetic diversity due to random genetic drift, which can reduce the population's ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions and increase the risk of extinction.

Effects of Demographic Stochasticity on Large Populations

In larger populations, demographic stochasticity is usually less pronounced because a small change in the number of individuals has a smaller proportional impact on the overall population size. For example, if a population of 1,000 individuals loses two members, it represents only a 0.2% decline. This means that larger populations are better able to buffer against random fluctuations in birth and death rates and are less likely to go extinct due to demographic stochasticity.

Conclusion

In summary, small populations are more susceptible to extinction from demographic stochasticity because random fluctuations in their population size have a greater proportional impact than in larger populations. Additionally, smaller populations are more likely to experience reduced genetic diversity due to random genetic drift, which can further increase their risk of extinction.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Why are small populations more susceptible to extinction from demographic stochasticity than are larger populations?

Short Answer

Step by step solution

Understanding Demographic Stochasticity

Effects of Demographic Stochasticity on Small Populations

Effects of Demographic Stochasticity on Large Populations

Conclusion

One App. One Place for Learning.

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

Biological Resources

Environmental Research

Ecology Research

Physical Environment

Living Environment

Ecological Conservation

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.