One way to look at solar payback time time is to note that an installed system will cost something like \(\$ 3,000\) for each \(\mathrm{kW}_{\mathrm{p}}\) (peak capacity), and that you'll produce \(x \mathrm{kWh}\) from that \(1 \mathrm{~kW}_{\mathrm{p}}\) array if your region gets \(x\) hours of full-sun- equivalent on average. Since each kWh of electricity costs something like \(\$ 0.15\), it becomes straightforward to compute the value per day as \(\$ 0.15 x\), and determine how long to match the \$3k investment. The result is independent of the actual array size, depending only on the cost per \(W_{p}\), the solar yield at your location, and the cost of electricity. What would the payback time be, in years, if the cost is \(\$ 3 / W_{p}, 17\) the yield is 6 hours per day of full-sun-equivalent, and electricity in your region costs \(\$ 0.15 / \mathrm{kWh}\) ?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The payback time for the solar panel investment is approximately 9.13 years.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the daily value of the solar energy produced

The daily value of the solar energy produced can be calculated as the product of the average number of full-sun-equivalent hours per day (x) and the cost of electricity per kWh. Daily value produced = \(x \cdot \$ 0.15\) Substituting the given values, Daily value produced = \(6 \cdot \$ 0.15 = \$ 0.90\)
02

Calculate the payback time in days

To find the payback time, we need to divide the installation cost by the daily value of the solar energy produced. Payback time (days) = \(\dfrac{\text{Installation Cost}}{\text{Daily Value Produced}}\) Payback time (days) = \(\dfrac{\$ 3,000}{\$ 0.90}\) Payback time (days) = \(3,333.33\) days
03

Convert the payback time to years

We can convert the payback time from days to years by dividing the payback time in days by the number of days in a year (assuming 365 days). Payback time (years) = \(\dfrac{\text{Payback Time in Days}}{365}\) Payback time (years) = \(\dfrac{3,333.33}{365}\) Payback time (years) ≈ \(9.13\) years The payback time for the solar panel investment, given the mentioned conditions, would be approximately 9.13 years.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The outcome of Problem 5 indicates that a hot light bulb filament emits thousands of times more power per unit area than human skin. Yet both a human and a light bulb may emit a similar amount of light \(^{105}\) - both around \(100 \mathrm{~W}\). Explain how both things can be true?

The study from Problem 24 finds that a flat panel facing south and tilted at various angles \(^{113}\) relative to the horizontal produce the following annual average yields in units of \(\mathrm{kWh} / \mathrm{m}^{2} /\) day: What tilt delivers the best yield for the year, and how much better is this (in percent) than a flat plate facing straight up? What tilt appears to result in minimal seasonal variation?

If we had two monochromatic (single-wavelength) light sources-a green one at \(\lambda=0.5 \mu \mathrm{m}\) and a near-infrared one at \(\lambda=1.0 \mu \mathrm{m}-\) each emitting photons at an energy rate of \(1 \mathrm{~W}, 103\) how does the number of photons emerging per second from each source compare? Is it the same number for each because both are \(1 \mathrm{~W}\) sources, or is it a different number-and by what factor, if so?

A 30 year study by the National Renewable Energy Lab \(^{112}\) indicates that in San Diego, a typical year delivers an annual average of \(5.0 \mathrm{kWh} / \mathrm{m}^{2} /\) day of insolation for a flat panel facing straight up. Convert this to \(\mathrm{W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\).

If typical insolation is \(200 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\), how much land area would be needed for a \(15 \%\) efficient flat PV array supplying an average of \(10,000 \mathrm{~W}\) for every person in the U.S. (population 330 million). If arranged in a square, how large is the side-length of this array? Draw it on top of a state of your choice, to scale.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free