Chapter 14: Problem 7
If \(50 \mathrm{~kJ}\) of energy are spent to extract \(1 \mathrm{MJ}\) of energy content in the form of coal, what is the EROEI?
Chapter 14: Problem 7
If \(50 \mathrm{~kJ}\) of energy are spent to extract \(1 \mathrm{MJ}\) of energy content in the form of coal, what is the EROEI?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for freeThe U.S. gets \(2.4\) qBtu per year of energy from burning biomass (mostly firewood). At an energy density of 4 kcal per gram, and a population of 330 million, how many 5 kg logs per year does this translate to per person?
Replicate the conclusion of Box \(14.3\) by assuming one-quarter of the 2 trillion tons \(\left(5 \times 10^{1} 4 \mathrm{~kg}\right)\) of mass is combustible at \(4 \mathrm{kcal} / \mathrm{g}\). How long-in years-would this amount of energy last if burning at 18 TW?
Re-express an EROEI of \(1.5: 1\) in terms of how many total units of energy must be produced in order to extract one unit of net energy in a self- supporting operation.
A large tree might have a trunk \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}\) in diameter and be \(40 \mathrm{~m}\) tall. Even though it branches out many times, pretend all the wood fits into a cylinder maintaining this \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}\) diameter for the full height of the tree. Wood floats, \({ }^{33}\) so let's say it has a density around \(800 \mathrm{~kg} / \mathrm{m}^{3}\). How many kilograms of \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) did this tree pull out of the atmosphere to get its carbon, if we treat the tree's mass as \(50 \%\) carbon?
Our modern food industry has an EROEI of 0.1:1. In pre-industrial settings, when energy investment for food production was in the form of muscle power (animal and human), why would a 0.1:1 EROEI for food have been untenable? Next, describe the conditions for an exact break-even food EROEI of 1:1. What would this mean in terms of where effort/energy goes? What would this leave for building shelters, cathedrals, or esthetic pursuits?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.