A large boulder whose mass is \(1,000 \mathrm{~kg}\) having a specific heat capacity of \(1,000 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} /{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) is heated from \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to a glowing \(1,800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\). How much more massive is it, assuming no atoms have been added or subtracted?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The change in mass of the boulder is \(2 \times 10^{-8} \mathrm{kg}\).

Step by step solution

01

Write the specific heat capacity formula

We can find the energy required to heat the boulder using the specific heat capacity formula, which states: $$Q = mc\Delta T$$ where \(Q\) is the heat energy, \(m\) is the mass of the boulder, \(c\) is the specific heat capacity, and \(\Delta T\) is the change in temperature (in this case, \(1,800^{\circ} \mathrm{C} - 0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\)).
02

Calculate the heat energy

Plugging the values into the specific heat capacity formula, we get: $$Q = (1,000 \mathrm{~kg}) (1,000 \mathrm{~J} / \mathrm{kg} /{ }^{\circ} \mathrm{C}) (1,800^{\circ}\mathrm{C} - 0^{\circ}\mathrm{C})$$ Solve for the heat energy, Q: $$Q = 1,000 \times 1,000 \times 1,800 \mathrm{~J}$$ $$Q = 1,800,000,000 \mathrm{~J}$$
03

Calculate the change in mass

Now, we know that energy and mass are related by Einstein's famous equation: $$ E = mc^2 $$ where \(E\) is the energy, \(m\) is the mass, and \(c\) is the speed of light. We want to find the change in mass, which we can call \(\Delta m\). Rearranging the equation to solve for \(\Delta m\), we get: $$\Delta m = \frac{E}{c^2}$$
04

Plug in the values and solve for the change in mass

Using the calculated heat energy (1,800,000,000 J) and the speed of light (approximately \(3 \times 10^8 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\)), we can now find the change in mass: $$\Delta m = \frac{1,800,000,000 \mathrm{~J}}{(3 \times 10^8 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s})^2}$$ $$\Delta m = \frac{1,800,000,000}{9 \times 10^{16}} \mathrm{kg}$$ $$\Delta m = 2 \times 10^{-8} \mathrm{kg}$$
05

Conclusion

The boulder becomes more massive by \(2 \times 10^{-8} \mathrm{kg}\) when it is heated from \(0^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\) to \(1,800^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), assuming no atoms have been added or subtracted.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Understanding Thermodynamics in the Context of Heating a Boulder
Thermodynamics is the branch of physics concerned with heat and temperature and their relation to energy and work. The specific heat capacity of a material is a crucial thermodynamic property that quantifies the amount of heat required to change the temperature of a unit mass of a substance by a degree Celsius (or Kelvin).

In our exercise involving the heating of a boulder, thermodynamics governs the energy transfer as heat flows into the boulder, increasing its internal energy and hence its temperature. We've used the specific heat capacity to determine the amount of energy needed to raise the boulder's temperature from \(0^{\circ} \text{C}\) to \(1,800^{\circ} \text{C}\). The detailed calculation through the specific heat capacity formula incorporates these principles, ensuring the precise estimation of the heat energy, denoted as \(Q\).

To optimize our understanding of this concept, we should visualize the process: Imagine the boulder absorbing heat energy, which causes the particles within it to vibrate more vigorously, leading to an increase in temperature. It's an exemplary scenario demonstrating how energy is transformed and transferred within a physical system, embodying the core ideas of thermodynamics.
Energy Conservation in the Heating Process
The law of energy conservation is a fundamental concept in physics stating that the total energy in an isolated system remains constant—it can neither be created nor destroyed, only converted from one form to another. This principle is at the heart of solving our boulder problem.

When we calculate the heat energy \(Q\) absorbed by the boulder, we are applying the energy conservation principle. The energy doesn't disappear; rather, it transforms from the heat provided by the surrounding into the increased internal energy of the boulder, which we perceive as a rise in temperature. This conversion is described quantitatively by the specific heat capacity equation used in the step-by-step solution.

Enhancing this discussion with a practical view, consider energy conservation like a financial budget: just as you cannot spend more money than you have, the boulder cannot emit or absorb more energy than is transferred to it. Hence, the calculated energy \(Q\) exactly equals the energy gain of the boulder, reflecting the concept of energy conservation in action.
Einstein's Mass-Energy Equivalence in Calculating Mass Change
Einstein's mass-energy equivalence is an iconic outcome of modern physics, encapsulated in the equation \(E=mc^2\). It asserts that mass can be converted into energy and vice versa—unveiling a profound connection between these two seemingly disparate properties.

In the context of heating the boulder, Einstein's equation becomes relevant when quantifying the apparently negligible increase in mass due to the absorbed energy. Although the mass change \(\Delta m\) is minuscule (\(2 \times 10^{-8} \text{kg}\)), it illustrates a profound truth about our universe: energy has mass, and mass embodies energy. This deep insight expands beyond our exercise, touching the realms of nuclear reactions and cosmology, where mass-energy equivalence becomes most evident.

To put this in perspective: the mass change in our heated boulder is minute compared to everyday experiences because the speed of light \(c\) in the equation is so large. Thus, even a stupendous amount of energy results in a slight change in mass. Nevertheless, this tiny mass increment is a testament to the transformation of absorbed thermal energy into the boulder's mass, a subtle yet real manifestation of Einstein's profound discovery.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If an atom were scaled up to be comparable to the extent of a mid-sized campus, how large would the nucleus be, and what sort of familiar object would be similar?

Explain in some detail what happens if control rods are too effective at absorbing neutrons so that each fission event produces too few unabsorbed neutrons.

Cosmic rays impinging on our atmosphere generate radioactive \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\) from \({ }^{14} \mathrm{~N}\) nuclei. \(^{78}\) These \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\) atoms soon team up with oxygen to form \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\), so that plants absorbing \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) from the air will have about one in a trillion of their carbon atoms in this form. Animals eating these plants \(^{79}\) will also have this fraction of carbon in their bodies, until they die and stop cycling carbon into their bodies. At this point, the fraction of carbon atoms in the form of \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\) in the body declines, with a half life of 5,715 years. If you dig up a human skull, and discover that only one-eighth of the usual one-trillionth of carbon atoms are \({ }^{14} \mathrm{C}\), how old do you deem the skull to be?

A particular fission of \({ }^{235} \mathrm{U}+\mathrm{n}(\) total \(A=236)\) breaks up. One fragment has \(Z=54\) and \(N=86\), making it \({ }^{140} \mathrm{Xe} .\) If no extra neutrons are produced in this event, what must the other fragment be, so all numbers add up? Refer to a periodic table (e.g., Fig. B.1; p. 375 ) to learn which element has the corresponding \(Z\) value, and express the result in the notation \({ }^{\mathrm{A}} \mathrm{X}\).

Based on the fractional mass loss associated with turning four hydrogen atoms into a helium atom, what fraction of the sun's mass would it lose over its lifetime by converting all its hydrogen into helium, under the simplifying assumption that it starts its life as \(100 \%\) hydrogen?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free