Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 15: Problem 22

Explain in some detail what happens if control rods are too effective at absorbing neutrons so that each fission event produces too few unabsorbed neutrons.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The consequences of control rods being too effective at absorbing neutrons in a nuclear reactor include a reduced rate of the nuclear fission chain reaction, decreased heat and steam production, lowering the output of the turbine-generator system, and reduced electricity generation. While this negatively impacts energy production, it also prevents the risk of uncontrolled reactions that could lead to accidents or meltdowns.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the role of control rods in a nuclear reactor

Control rods are an essential component of nuclear reactors that control the rate of the nuclear fission reaction. They do this by absorbing neutrons released during fission events, which prevents the chain reaction from accelerating uncontrollably. Control rods are made of materials with a high neutron absorption cross-section, commonly boron, hafnium, or cadmium.
02

Define neutron absorption

Neutron absorption is the process by which a neutron is captured by an atomic nucleus. Absorbing neutrons during fission events serves to control the number of neutrons available for other fissions, thus controlling the rate of the chain reaction. This process is crucial to maintaining a stable nuclear reactor.
03

Describe the consequences of too few unabsorbed neutrons

If control rods are too effective at absorbing neutrons, this means that there will be too few unabsorbed neutrons for each fission event. Since neutrons are needed to cause further fission events, a decreased number of unabsorbed neutrons will lead to a reduced rate of the nuclear fission chain reaction. If the reaction rate drops too much, this could result in the reactor going subcritical – at this point, the reactor will not be able to achieve a self-sustaining chain reaction and will effectively shut down.
04

Effects on energy production and safety

Due to the reduced rate of fission events, the nuclear reactor will produce less heat. This, in turn, will lead to decreased steam production, reducing the output of the turbine-generator system and lowering electricity generation. Although this may negatively impact electricity production, having control rods that are too effective also prevents the risk of an uncontrolled reaction, which could lead to accidents or meltdowns.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If an atom were scaled up to be comparable to the extent of a mid-sized campus, how large would the nucleus be, and what sort of familiar object would be similar?

If a friend creates a nucleus whose half-life is 4 hours and gives it to you at noon, what is the probability that it will not have decayed by noon the following day?

Since each nuclear plant delivers \(\sim 1 \mathrm{GW}\) of electrical power, at \(\sim 40 \%\) thermodynamic efficiency this means a thermal generation rate of \(2.5\) GW. How many nuclear plants would we need to supply all 18 TW of our current energy demand? Since a typical lifetime is 50 years before decommissioning, how many days, on average would it be between new plants coming online (while old ones are retired) in a steady state?

To illustrate the principle, let's say we start with a nucleus whose mass is \(200.000\) a.m.u. and inject \(1,600 \mathrm{MeV}\) of energy to completely dismantle the nucleus into its constituent parts. How much mass would the final collection of parts have? a) the exact same: \(200.000\) a.m.u. b) less than \(200.000\) a.m.u. c) more than \(200.000\) a.m.u.

Based on the calculation that 18 TW would require an annual cube of seawater \(300 \mathrm{~m}\) on a side to provide enough deuterium, what is your personal share as one of 8 billion people on earth, in liters? Could you lift this yourself? One cubic meter is \(1,000 \mathrm{~L}\).
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

Ecological Conservation

Read Explanation

Living Environment

Read Explanation

Pollution

Read Explanation

Energy Resources

Read Explanation

Sustainability

Read Explanation

Biological Resources

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free