On balance, considering the benefits and downsides of conventional nuclear fission, where do you come down in terms of support for either terminating, continuing, or expanding our use of this technology? Should we pursue breeder reactors at a large scale? Please justify your conclusion based on the things you consider to be most important.

Based on the analysis of the benefits and downsides of conventional nuclear fission and breeder reactors, write a short answer on whether nuclear fission technology should be terminated, continued, or expanded, and if pursuing breeder reactors at a large scale is a good idea. Considering the benefits and downsides of conventional nuclear fission technology, it is advisable to continue its use but with a cautious approach. Focusing on stricter safety regulations, proper waste management, and investment in research for improved nuclear technologies can contribute to a cleaner and more stable energy source, while addressing some of the risks associated. Furthermore, breeder reactors represent a promising alternative for sustainable energy and waste reduction, but the potential risks, high costs, and technical challenges must be addressed before large-scale implementation. It's essential to invest in research and development of breeder reactors and to assess the safety, feasibility, and security aspects before deploying them widely. In conclusion, nuclear fission technology should continue to be utilized, with a focus on improving its safety, waste management, and efficiency. Meanwhile, the pursuit of breeder reactors as a large-scale solution should be approached with caution, ensuring that potential challenges and risks are thoroughly addressed before significant implementation.