Let's imagine waves hitting the entire \(2,000 \mathrm{~km}\) Pacific coastline of the U.S. that are different from those evaluated in the text. This time, the waves have \(50 \mathrm{~m}\) wavelength, arriving every 10 seconds, and \(2 \mathrm{~m}\) crest-to-trough amplitude. How much power does the coast receive under these more active conditions?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Under these more active conditions, the coast receives approximately \(5.09825\times 10^9 \mathrm{~W}\) of power.

Step by step solution

01

Convert length of coastline to meters

To proceed with our calculations, we need to convert the length of the coastline to meters. $$L = 2000 \mathrm{~km} * 1000 \mathrm{~m/km} = 2,000,000 \mathrm{~m}$$
02

Calculate wave speed

We can calculate the wave speed (v) by dividing the wavelength (λ) by the period (T): $$v = \frac{\lambda}{T} = \frac{50 \mathrm{~m}}{10 \mathrm{~s}} = 5 \mathrm{~m/s}$$
03

Calculate wave frequency

Next, we can calculate the frequency (f) of the waves by taking the inverse of the period (T): $$f = \frac{1}{T} = \frac{1}{10 \mathrm{~s}} = 0.1 \mathrm{~Hz}$$
04

Calculate wave energy density

We will use the wave energy density formula to calculate the energy density (E) of the waves: $$E = \frac{1}{8}*\rho*g*A^2$$ Where ρ is the density of seawater, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and A is the amplitude of the waves. Assuming the density of seawater is 1025 kg/m³ and the acceleration due to gravity is 9.81 m/s², we can find the wave energy density: $$E = \frac{1}{8}\times 1025 \mathrm{~kg/m^3}\times 9.81 \mathrm{~m/s^2}\times (2 \mathrm{~m})^2 = 5098.25 \mathrm{~J/m^2}$$
05

Calculate the power received by the coast

Now, we can calculate the power received by the coast (P) using the wave energy density (E), the wave speed (v), the length of the coastline (L), and the frequency (f): $$P = E \times v \times L \times f = 5098.25 \mathrm{~J/m^2} \times 5 \mathrm{~m/s} \times 2,000,000 \mathrm{~m} \times 0.1 \mathrm{~Hz}$$ $$P = 5.09825\times 10^9 \mathrm{~W}$$ Therefore, under these more active conditions, the coast receives approximately \(5.09825\times 10^9 \mathrm{~W}\) of power.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

If placed in a steady current of \(1 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\), and at a generation efficiency of \(40 \%\), how large would an ocean current rotor be (diameter) to satisfy the \(10,000 \mathrm{~W}\) demand of the average American? Put this scale in the context of some familiar object or space.

At \(4 \mathrm{~km}\) down, we expect the \(\Delta T\) to be about \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and each cubic meter of rock would contain about \(250 \mathrm{MJ}\) of thermal energy. If \(50 \%\) of the maximum theoretical efficiency were achieved from an ambient environment at \(288 \mathrm{~K}\), how much rock thickness would have to be depleted in a year to satisfy a \(1 \mathrm{~km}^{2}\) campus whose output electricity demand is \(20 \mathrm{MW}\) ?

If it were possible to achieve \(60 \%\) of the theoretical maximum heat engine efficiency for a geothermal plant, how deep would it have to drill to access high enough temperatures to match the \(35 \%\) efficiency of fossil fuel power plants if the thermal gradient is \(25^{\circ} \mathrm{C} / \mathrm{km} ?\) Have we drilled this far before?

What are your thoughts on whether we should "mine" geothermal heat in a way that could theoretically last hundreds or thousands of years, but not tens of thousands of years before depleting the resource? Such activity would not be strictly sustainable in the long haul, but could seem abundant for many generations. Should we care about this? Where do you land?

The Sihwa tidal power plant has a reservoir area of \(30 \mathrm{~km}^{2}\) and is rated to generate \(254 \mathrm{MW}\) of electrical output. If generation efficiency is \(90 \%\), what initial water height does the power rating correspond to, assuming a 6 hour discharge time?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free