What are your thoughts on whether we should "mine" geothermal heat in a way that could theoretically last hundreds or thousands of years, but not tens of thousands of years before depleting the resource? Such activity would not be strictly sustainable in the long haul, but could seem abundant for many generations. Should we care about this? Where do you land?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: Personally, I believe that if we can develop and utilize geothermal heat mining in a way that ensures sustainability and maintains the resource for future generations, it is an option worth pursuing. While taking into consideration the potential environmental and social impacts, we should strive to find a balance between meeting today's energy demands and preserving the resources for tomorrow. Advancements in technology and responsible resource management can potentially help us achieve this balance and make the most of this abundant resource, without depleting it.

Step by step solution

01

Pros of mining geothermal heat

Geothermal energy is a reliable and abundant source of power, with low greenhouse gas emissions and relatively low environmental impacts compared to fossil fuels. Using this resource could help to reduce dependency on finite fossil fuel resources while still providing a stable power supply. Additionally, geothermal energy is not weather-dependent, making it a consistent and predictable energy source.
02

Cons of mining geothermal heat

Although geothermal energy is considered renewable, it might not remain sustainable if it is mined at a rate faster than it can be replenished. This could eventually lead to the depletion of the resource after tens of thousands of years. Moreover, despite its low environmental impact, there are still concerns regarding land use, water consumption, and the potential for seismic activity associated with geothermal development.
03

Considering long-term implications

One of the main concerns in the discussion is whether the benefits of mining geothermal heat over many generations outweigh the risks of depleting the resource in the long term. This factor should be carefully assessed, potentially through modeling and projections of resource utilization over time. It is essential to consider the importance of preserving resources for future generations and to avoid passing on an exhausted resource to them.
04

Personal opinion

After evaluating the pros and cons of mining geothermal heat, the student should provide their personal standpoint on whether it is a responsible and practical idea. The opinion should consider factors such as technological advancements, the potential for sustainable use of the resource, and the importance of balancing the needs of the present with those of the future. For example: "Personally, I believe that if we can develop and utilize geothermal heat mining in a way that ensures sustainability and maintains the resource for future generations, it is an option worth pursuing. While taking into consideration the potential environmental and social impacts, we should strive to find a balance between meeting today's energy demands and preserving the resources for tomorrow. Advancements in technology and responsible resource management can potentially help us achieve this balance and make the most of this abundant resource, without depleting it."

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Sihwa tidal power plant has a reservoir area of \(30 \mathrm{~km}^{2}\) and is rated to generate \(254 \mathrm{MW}\) of electrical output. If generation efficiency is \(90 \%\), what initial water height does the power rating correspond to, assuming a 6 hour discharge time?

At \(4 \mathrm{~km}\) down, we expect the \(\Delta T\) to be about \(100^{\circ} \mathrm{C}\), and each cubic meter of rock would contain about \(250 \mathrm{MJ}\) of thermal energy. If \(50 \%\) of the maximum theoretical efficiency were achieved from an ambient environment at \(288 \mathrm{~K}\), how much rock thickness would have to be depleted in a year to satisfy a \(1 \mathrm{~km}^{2}\) campus whose output electricity demand is \(20 \mathrm{MW}\) ?

Your friend just visited a geothermal power plant, and is excited by the facts that it is environmentally clean, not intermittent like solar or wind, can last ages, totals more than twice our 18 TW budget, and it really works-seen with their very own eyes. What are the key points you might offer to temper their unvarnished enthusiasm?

If placed in a steady current of \(1 \mathrm{~m} / \mathrm{s}\), and at a generation efficiency of \(40 \%\), how large would an ocean current rotor be (diameter) to satisfy the \(10,000 \mathrm{~W}\) demand of the average American? Put this scale in the context of some familiar object or space.

Let's imagine waves hitting the entire \(2,000 \mathrm{~km}\) Pacific coastline of the U.S. that are different from those evaluated in the text. This time, the waves have \(50 \mathrm{~m}\) wavelength, arriving every 10 seconds, and \(2 \mathrm{~m}\) crest-to-trough amplitude. How much power does the coast receive under these more active conditions?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free