Log out Go to App
Go to App

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 19: Problem 5

Why do you think we have not yet formulated a master plan for how humans can live on the earth indefinitely without exceeding limits?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Answer: The main reasons for the lack of a master plan for sustainable living on Earth include the complexity of the problem, conflicting interests of stakeholders, limitations in current knowledge and technology, inadequate commitment from governments and societies, and psychological and educational barriers.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Complexity of the Problem

The first step in addressing this exercise is to recognize the complexity of the problem. Formulating a master plan for sustainable living on Earth involves a multitude of factors, such as population growth, resource consumption, waste management, energy production, and ecological conservation. The interdependencies between these factors make the task of creating a comprehensive and effective plan even more challenging.
02

Identifying Conflicting Interests and Priorities

Various stakeholders, such as governments, businesses, and individuals, may have different interests and priorities that conflict with each other. For example, economic growth is a critical priority for many countries, which often leads to resource exploitation and environmental degradation. Balancing these competing interests and finding a common ground to develop a master plan is a challenging task.
03

Acknowledging the Limitations of Current Knowledge and Technology

Finding a sustainable way to live on Earth indefinitely requires a deep understanding of the Earth's systems and advanced technological solutions. However, our current knowledge about the planet and its complex ecosystems is still evolving, making it difficult to predict the long-term implications of various actions. Additionally, some of the technologies required to implement sustainable practices are either not yet available or too expensive for widespread use.
04

Addressing the Role of Governments and Societies

The formulation of a master plan for sustainable living on Earth would require strong leadership, collaboration, and commitment from governments and societies around the world. However, reaching a global consensus on such a plan can be difficult due to differing political, cultural, and economic conditions. Moreover, issues such as corruption, bureaucracy, and lack of political will may hinder the implementation of the plan.
05

Overcoming Psychological Barriers and Education

Lastly, changing human behavior and values is essential for the successful implementation of a master plan for sustainable living on Earth. Educating people about the consequences of their actions and promoting sustainable lifestyles can help in this regard. However, overcoming psychological barriers, such as cognitive dissonance and resistance to change, can be a significant challenge. In conclusion, the absence of a master plan for living sustainably on Earth indefinitely can be attributed to the complexity of the problem, conflicting interests, limitations in current knowledge and technology, inadequate commitment from governments and societies, and psychological and educational barriers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

To visualize the scale of the \(\$ 100\) trillion global economy relative to the value of the earth-conservatively one million times largerlet's think in terms of animal volume. Volume scales like the cube of linear dimension. How much would you have to shrink a dog in linear scale for its volume to be one- millionth its original size? If the typical scale of a dog is \(0.5 \mathrm{~m}\), how large is the shrunken version, and what animal is about this size?

What institutions can you think of that are prevalent now but will be rendered obsolete- or at least radically diminished-if the economy stopped growing permanently?

What do you find appealing about a steady-state economic model? What do you find worrisome?

Why do you think the field of traditional economics does not recognize limits to growth, and does not have a macro-macro branch looking at the whole planet and its finite nature?

In analogy to the clueless cats in Box \(19.2\) and the paragraph following, describe how we might plausibly destroy something valuable on our planet without understanding it fully enough to repair the damage.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

Sustainability

Read Explanation

Energy Resources

Read Explanation

Pollution

Read Explanation

Biological Resources

Read Explanation

Physical Environment

Read Explanation

Living Environment

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free