If it were certain that the only way to provide a comfortable existence to future generations involved substantial cutbacks toward a lifestyle having far fewer energy and material comforts today, do you think humanity would voluntarily do so? Can we leave treats on the shelf, within easy reach? If so, is it only uncertainty that prevents us? If not, what do you see as the barriers?

Short Answer

Expert verified
What barriers might hinder making such sacrifices, and how might uncertainty about the outcome influence people's actions? Discuss and provide your thoughts on this issue.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the question

The exercise asks whether people would voluntarily choose to live with less energy and material comforts today in order to secure a comfortable existence for future generations. The student should also consider if only uncertainty prevents us from making these changes and identify the barriers that hinder making sacrifices.
02

Possible barriers

In order to give a comprehensive answer to this question, let's identify some possible barriers that could prevent people from making voluntary sacrifices for a more sustainable future. Some possible barriers could be: 1. Selfishness and comfort: People might not be willing to give up their current lifestyle and conveniences. 2. Short-term thinking: It's human nature to prioritize short-term goals over long-term consequences. 3. Economic interests: The economy might prioritize growth over sustainable living. 4. Lack of education and awareness: Many people don't have a strong understanding of sustainability or why it's essential for the future.
03

Effect of uncertainty

Another part of this exercise is to analyze the effect of uncertainty on making voluntary changes for future generations. It is possible that due to uncertain outcomes, people might be less likely to make sacrifices. The lack of clarity regarding the effectiveness of individual actions on the larger scale could be a major factor in preventing people from making these changes.
04

Discussion points

To foster critical thinking and a more in-depth understanding of the issue, the student can consider the following points for discussion: 1. Are there examples of societies or communities that have made similar sacrifices in the past? 2. What measures could governments or institutions take to encourage individuals to make these sacrifices? 3. Is sustainable living and maintaining material comforts mutually exclusive? Can there be a balance? 4. How can education and awareness campaigns be more effective in promoting sustainable living? By considering these points and analyzing the barriers, the student can come up with a well-thought-out response to the exercise on whether humanity would voluntarily make sacrifices for future generations' comfortable existence.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Treating Figure \(9.9\) somewhat literally, in which one out of every four infrared photons escapes without being absorbed by a greenhouse gas molecule, what would the effective upward radiation be if \(400 \mathrm{~W} / \mathrm{m}^{2}\) left the ground, and re-radiation of the absorbed fraction was split equally between upward radiation and radiation returning to the ground? \(^{83}\)

How might you express the tradeoffs between the available fossil fuel resource and climate change? In other words, if it turns out that we don't have nearly as much fossil fuel as we think, what does this mean for climate change vs. our economic/geopolitical stability and viability? On the other hand, if we have centuries of fossil fuels left, what does that mean? Which scenario is least disruptive?

Typical household electricity use in the U.S. is about 30 kilowatthours (kWh) per day. If the electricity is produced by a natural gas plant operating at \(40 \%\) efficiency, each household requires \(75 \mathrm{kWh}\) of energy from natural gas each day. Converting this to Joules, and using the intensity of \(49 \mathrm{~g} / \mathrm{MJ}\) from Table \(9.1\), how \(\mathrm{much} \mathrm{CO}_{2}\) is produced daily to supply a house with electricity from a natural gas source?

If carbon dioxide emission is a chief concern, switching from a coal-fired electricity plant to natural gas input is still a use of fossil fuels, but natural gas produces less \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) per energy unit than coal (Table 9.1). By what factor would \(\mathrm{CO}_{2}\) emissions be reduced if replacing all energy \(^{76}\) we now get from coal with energy from natural gas?

Which of the following are positive vs. negative feedback effects for climate change as a result of warming, and why? a) warming tundra releases methane trapped in the permafrost b) more water in the atmosphere creates more clouds and increases the amount of sunlight reflected from Earth c) an increase in forest fire activity burns lots of carbon-based material and leaves a blackened earth d) snow covers less of the land each winter as temperatures rise

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Environmental Science Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free