Chapter 4: Problem 1

Sometimes the species of a community are described as forming a food chain. Why is it usually more appropriate to speak instead of a food web?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Food webs are more appropriate than food chains to represent species in a community because they offer a more realistic representation of the complex feeding interactions among various species. Food webs include multiple food chains, showing the interconnectedness of species through different trophic levels. Ecosystems with complex food webs are also more stable, as they have built-in redundancies and buffers that help them withstand disturbances more effectively than simple food chains.

Step by step solution

Defining Food Chain and Food Web

A food chain is a linear series of organisms through which energy and nutrients pass, starting with a producer (usually a plant) and continuing with herbivores, primary predators, secondary predators, and so on. It represents a single pathway for energy flow in an ecosystem. A food web, on the other hand, is a complex network of feeding interactions among various species in an ecosystem. It includes multiple food chains and illustrates the interconnectedness of species through different trophic levels.

Limitations of Food Chains

A food chain is a simplistic representation of species interactions in an ecosystem. It assumes that each organism relies on only one specific source of food. However, in reality, most organisms have multiple food sources, and the entire community is much more complex and interconnected than a linear chain suggests.

Advantages of Food Webs

Food webs offer a more realistic representation of species interactions in an ecosystem, as they consider the multiple food sources and complex feeding relationships among organisms. This interconnectedness is essential for understanding how energy flows through an ecosystem and how species can influence each other directly or indirectly.

Stability of Ecosystems

Ecosystems with complex food webs are more stable than those with simple food chains because they have built-in redundancies and buffers. This allows them to withstand disturbances, such as changes in population size or the loss of a species, more effectively. In contrast, ecosystems with simple food chains are more susceptible to collapse or rapid change when disturbances occur.

Conclusion

Based on the reasons outlined above, it is usually more appropriate to represent species in a community as forming a food web rather than a food chain. Food webs provide a more accurate representation of the complex relationships among species and helps us better understand the flow of energy and nutrients in an ecosystem.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.

Start your free trial

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Sometimes the species of a community are described as forming a food chain. Why is it usually more appropriate to speak instead of a food web?

Short Answer

Step by step solution

Defining Food Chain and Food Web

Limitations of Food Chains

Advantages of Food Webs

Stability of Ecosystems

Conclusion

One App. One Place for Learning.

Most popular questions from this chapter

Recommended explanations on Geography Textbooks

River Landscapes

Migration and Identity

Water Cycle

Geographical Skills

Regenerating Places

Globalisation

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.