Chapter 13: Problem 5
a. In the typical economic model of an efficient fishery would a fall in the price of fish generally result in a larger or a smaller sustainable harvest? Why? b. Suppose the fishery allowed free access. Would a fall in the price of fish generally result in a larger or a smaller harvest? Why?
Short Answer
Expert verified
Answer: In an efficient fishery, a fall in the price of fish generally results in a smaller sustainable harvest as fishermen decrease their fishing efforts to balance their costs. In a fishery with free access, the total harvest is uncertain due to various factors like the availability of fish, technology, and costs, but it may either remain roughly the same or even increase. However, this could lead to overfishing, making it difficult to maintain long-term sustainability.
Step by step solution
01
Part a: Efficient Fishery Sustainable Harvest
In a typical economic model of an efficient fishery, the sustainable harvest happens when the marginal cost of fishing (MCF) equals the marginal benefit of fishing (MBF). With a decrease in the price of fish, the MBF will also decrease.
In this situation, the new MBF will meet MCF at a lower quantity, resulting in a smaller sustainable harvest. The reason is that the lower fish price will mean less revenue for the fishermen, which leads to a decrease in fishing efforts to balance out their costs.
Thus, in an efficient fishery, a fall in the price of fish will generally result in a smaller sustainable harvest.
02
Part b: Free Access Fishery Harvest
On the other hand, in a fishery with free access, anyone can enter the fishery without restrictions. In this case, the decrease in price does not necessarily affect the total harvest as in the efficient fishery model.
When the price of fish drops, new fishermen may still be attracted to the fishery by the prospect of earning revenue, even if it's lower than before. The increased effort from these new entrants could offset the decreases in harvest made by the existing fishermen who might have reduced their efforts due to the lower price.
On the whole, the total harvest could either remain roughly the same or even increase depending on market forces and factors such as the availability of fish, technology, and costs. However, it's important to note that this situation tends to lead to overfishing, as the fishery's resources are exploited without restrictions, making it difficult to maintain a sustainable harvest in the long term.
Thus, in a fishery with free access, a fall in the price of fish will generally result in an uncertain total harvest as it depends on various factors.
Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!
-
Full Textbook Solutions
Get detailed explanations and key concepts
-
Unlimited Al creation
Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...
-
Ads-free access
To over 500 millions flashcards
-
Money-back guarantee
We refund you if you fail your exam.
Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!
Key Concepts
These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.
Sustainable Harvest
Understanding sustainable harvest within the context of fisheries is crucial to ensure the long-term viability of fish populations. A sustainable harvest is one that balances fish removal with the natural reproduction and growth of the species. This balance enables the fishery to continue producing at a consistent rate without depleting the resource. In an ideal scenario, fishermen harvest only as much as can be naturally replenished, meaning it's a level of catch that can be maintained indefinitely without causing a population decline.
Economic factors such as market demand and fish prices heavily influence the quantity harvested. When fish prices are high, fishermen are motivated to catch more, but there’s a limit to what they can sustainably take without harming the population. Lower fish prices, as described in the exercise, typically reduce the incentive to fish extensively, resulting in a smaller sustainable harvest in an efficient fishery where regulations are designed to match harvest levels with the fishery's production abilities.
Economic factors such as market demand and fish prices heavily influence the quantity harvested. When fish prices are high, fishermen are motivated to catch more, but there’s a limit to what they can sustainably take without harming the population. Lower fish prices, as described in the exercise, typically reduce the incentive to fish extensively, resulting in a smaller sustainable harvest in an efficient fishery where regulations are designed to match harvest levels with the fishery's production abilities.
Marginal Cost of Fishing
The marginal cost of fishing (MCF) refers to the increase in total costs when one additional unit of fish is caught. As more fish are harvested, the cost to catch additional fish can increase due to factors such as increased fuel consumption for longer trips or diminishing fish stocks making fish harder to catch. In the context of an economic model, a fishery is considered 'efficient' when the marginal cost equals the marginal benefit. This optimal point ensures that the fish population remains healthy while allowing fishermen to maximize profits.
Fishermen need to consider the MCF carefully as they decide how much effort to put into their fishing activities. There must be a balance because if the cost of catching an additional fish is higher than the revenue, it will result in financial losses and could also push the fishery towards unsustainability.
Fishermen need to consider the MCF carefully as they decide how much effort to put into their fishing activities. There must be a balance because if the cost of catching an additional fish is higher than the revenue, it will result in financial losses and could also push the fishery towards unsustainability.
Marginal Benefit of Fishing
Parallel to the cost side of the equation is the marginal benefit of fishing (MBF), which represents the additional revenue or 'benefit' from catching one more unit of fish. These benefits diminish as more fish are harvested, especially if the market is saturated, or prices drop—both of which reduce the profits from each additional catch.
When the price of fish falls, the MBF decreases because each fish sold generates less income. As a result, the decrease in MBF usually leads to reduced fishing activity, since the incentive to catch more fish diminishes. The MBF must be balanced against the MCF to determine the most profitable and sustainable level of harvest.
When the price of fish falls, the MBF decreases because each fish sold generates less income. As a result, the decrease in MBF usually leads to reduced fishing activity, since the incentive to catch more fish diminishes. The MBF must be balanced against the MCF to determine the most profitable and sustainable level of harvest.
Efficient Fishery
An efficient fishery operates where the marginal cost of fishing equals the marginal benefit, allowing for a sustainable harvest that optimizes the use of resources without leading to overexploitation. This balance helps to prevent overfishing and ensures that fish stocks are maintained at sustainable levels, thereby securing the ecosystem and the fishery’s future. Efficient fisheries typically involve management practices such as catch quotas, size limits, and seasonal closures to help maintain this balance.
When prices drop in an efficient fishery, as the exercise mentions, a smaller sustainable harvest is expected because the MBF decreases, making some fishing efforts unprofitable. Fishermen, hence, reduce their activities to keep their operations economically viable. Such adjustments help in maintaining an efficient fishery.
When prices drop in an efficient fishery, as the exercise mentions, a smaller sustainable harvest is expected because the MBF decreases, making some fishing efforts unprofitable. Fishermen, hence, reduce their activities to keep their operations economically viable. Such adjustments help in maintaining an efficient fishery.
Free Access Fishery
Contrarily, a 'free access fishery' is characterized by the absence of restrictions on who can fish and how much they can catch. This openness can lead to the 'tragedy of the commons,' where individual users act independently according to their own self-interest and behave contrary to the common good by depleting the shared resource. As the price of fish decreases, fishermen may still enter the fishery or continue fishing, hoping to make profits despite lower market prices, which can lead to increased competition and overfishing.
With no barriers to entry, a free access fishery might not respond to a fall in fish prices with a decreased harvest. Instead, the total harvest may stay the same or even increase if newcomers enter the fishery seeking income despite reduced profits.
With no barriers to entry, a free access fishery might not respond to a fall in fish prices with a decreased harvest. Instead, the total harvest may stay the same or even increase if newcomers enter the fishery seeking income despite reduced profits.
Overfishing
Overfishing occurs when fish are captured at a faster rate than they can reproduce, inevitably leading to a depletion of the fish stock. Overfishing can be a consequence of poor fishery management, such as in a free access fishery, where there are no limits on catch sizes or fishing efforts. It can result in the collapse of the fishery, adversely affect the local economy, and cause severe ecological impacts by disrupting the balance of the marine ecosystem.
A key factor in the prevention of overfishing is to set and enforce sustainable harvest limits that are informed by scientific assessments of fish stock health. Falling fish prices can exacerbate overfishing if they encourage more people to fish to try and maintain their income, leading to a situation where sustainable practices are cast aside in favor of immediate financial gain.
A key factor in the prevention of overfishing is to set and enforce sustainable harvest limits that are informed by scientific assessments of fish stock health. Falling fish prices can exacerbate overfishing if they encourage more people to fish to try and maintain their income, leading to a situation where sustainable practices are cast aside in favor of immediate financial gain.