In Example 3f, suppose that the new evidence is subject to different possible interpretations and in fact shows only that it is 90 percent likely that the criminal possesses the characteristic in question. In this case, how likely would it be that the suspect is guilty (assuming, as before, that he has the characteristic)?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The suspect feel guilty by 87%.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The new evidence is subject to different possible interpretations and in fact shows only that it is90 percent likely that the criminal possesses the characteristic in question

02

Solution

The solution will be,

G=event that the suspect is guilty

C=event that he possesses the characteristic of the criminal

Then,

P(GC)=P(GC)P(C)

=P(CG)P(G)P(CG)PCGCPGC

=(0.9)(0.6)(0.9)(0.6)+(0.2)(0.4)

=0.540.62

=2731

=87%

03

Final answer

In this case that the suspect feel guilty by 87%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider a school community of mfamilies, with niof them having ichildren, i=1,,k,i=1kni=mConsider the following two methods for choosing a child:

1. Choose one of the mfamilies at random and then randomly choose a child from that family.

2. Choose one of the i=1kinichildren at random.

Show that method 1is more likely than method 2to result

in the choice of a firstborn child.

Hint: In solving this problem, you will need to show that

i=1kinij=1knjji=1knij=1knj

To do so, multiply the sums and show that for all pairs i,j, the coefficient of the termninj is greater in the expression on the left than in the one on the right.

On rainy days, Joe is late to work with probability .3; on nonrainy days, he is late with probability .1. With probability .7, it will rain tomorrow.

(a) Find the probability that Joe is early tomorrow.

(b) Given that Joe was early, what is the conditional probability that it rained?

A red die, a blue die, and a yellow die (all six-sided) are rolled. We are interested in the probability that the number appearing on the blue die is less than that appearing on the yellow die, which is less than that appearing on the red die. That is, with B, Y, and R denoting, respectively, the number appearing on the blue, yellow, and red die, we are interested in P(B<Y<R).

(a) What is the probability that no two of the dice land on the same number?

(b) Given that no two of the dice land on the same number, what is the conditional probability that B<Y<R?

(c) What is P(B<Y<R)?

In Laplace’s rule of succession (Example 5e), suppose that the first nflips resulted in r heads and nrtails. Show that the probability that the(n+1)flip turns up heads is (r+1)/(n+2). To do so, you will have to prove and use the identity

01yn(1-y)mdy=n!m!(n+m+1)!

Hint: To prove the identity, let C(n,m)=01yn(1-y)mdy. Integrating by parts yields

C(n,m)=mn+1C(n+1,m-1)

Starting with C(n,0)=1/(n+1), prove the identity by induction on m.

Suppose that E and F are mutually exclusive events of an experiment. Suppose that E and F are mutually exclusive events of an experiment. Show that if independent trials of this experiment are performed, then E will occur before F with probability P(E)/[P(E) + P(F)].

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free