If Xis a geometric random variable, show analytically that

P{X=n+kX>n}=P{X=k}

Using the interpretation of a geometric random variable, give a verbal argument as to why the preceding equation is true.

Short Answer

Expert verified

We proved that

P{X=n+kX>n}=P{X=k}

Step by step solution

01

Definition

A random variable that takes the value k, a non-negative integer with probability pk(1-p).

02

Calculation

P{X=n+kX>n}=P{X=n+kX>n}P(X>n)

P{X=n+kX>n}=(1-p)n+k-1p

P(X>n)=First nare failures

=(1-p)n

P{X=n+kX>n}=(1-p)n+k-1(1-p)n.p

=(1-p)k-1p

=P{X=k}

Hence proved

03

continue Calculation

Also because trials are independent

Given that first ntrials does'nt result in success

Next kthwill result in success and next (k-1)in failures =(1-p)k-1p

=P{X=k}

P{X=n+kX>n}=P{X=k}

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Let Xbe a Poisson random variable with parameter λ. What value of λmaximizes P{X=k},k0?

To determine whether they have a certain disease, 100people are to have their blood tested. However, rather than testing each individual separately, it has been decided first to place the people into groups of 10. The blood samples of the 10people in each group will be pooled and analyzed together. If the test is negative, one test will suffice for the 10people, whereas if the test is positive, each of the 10people will also be individually tested and, in all, 11tests will be made on this group. Assume that the probability that a person has the disease isrole="math" localid="1646542351988" .1 for all people, independently of one another, and compute the expected number of tests necessary for each group. (Note that we are assuming that the pooled test will be positive if at least one person in the pool has the disease.)

Consider n independent trials, each of which results in one of the outcomes 1,...,kwith respective probabilities p1,,pk,i=1kpi=1Show that if all the pi are small, then the probability that no trial outcome occurs more than once is approximately equal toexp(-n(n-1)ipi2/2).

Let X represent the difference between the number of heads and the number of tails obtained when a coin is tossed n times. What are the possible values of X?

Each of 500 soldiers in an army company independently has a certain disease with probability 1/103. This disease will show up in a blood test, and to facilitate matters, blood samples from all 500 soldiers are pooled and tested.

(a) What is the (approximate) probability that the blood test will be positive (that is, at least one person has the disease)? Suppose now that the blood test yields a positive result.

(b) What is the probability, under this circumstance, that more than one person has the disease? Now, suppose one of the 500 people is Jones, who knows that he has the disease.

(c) What does Jones think is the probability that more than one person has the disease? Because the pooled test was positive, the authorities have decided to test each individual separately. The first i − 1 of these tests were negative, and the ith one—which was on Jones—was positive.

(d) Given the preceding scenario, what is the probability, as a function of i, that any of the remaining people have the disease?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free