In some military courts, 9judges are appointed. However, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are entitled to a peremptory challenge of any judge, in which case that judge is removed from the case and is not replaced. A defendant is declared guilty if the majority of judges cast votes of guilty, and he or she is declared innocent otherwise. Suppose that when the defendant is, in fact, guilty, each judge will (independently) vote guilty with probability .7,whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .3.

(a) What is the probability that a guilty defendant is declared guilty when there are (i) 9, (ii) 8, and (iii) 7judges?

(b) Repeat part (a) for an innocent defendant.

(c) If the prosecuting attorney does not exercise the right to a peremptory challenge of a judge, and if the defense is limited to at most two such challenges, how many challenges should the defense attorney make if he or she is 60percent certain that the client is guilty?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Defendant has minimal probability that he will be judged if we remove one juror.

Step by step solution

01

Given information (part a)

In some military courts, 9 judges are appointed. However, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are entitled to a peremptory challenge of any judge, in which case that judge is removed from the case and is not replaced. A defendant is declared guilty if the majority of judges cast votes of guilty, and he or she is declared innocent otherwise. Suppose that when the defendant is, in fact, guilty, each judge will (independently) vote guilty with probability .7, whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .3.

02

Step 2:Explanation(part a)

Define random variable Xthat marks the number of jurors that vote that the defendant is guilty and suppose that there are njurors. Also, defineYthat marks whether the defendant is guilty or not.

Given Y, we have that Xhas binomial distribution with parameters nand appropriate probability of judgement ( 0.7if Y=1and 0.3otherwise). Hence

n=9P(X5Y=1)=i=599i0.7i0.39-i0.90119134

n=8P(X5Y=1)=i=588i0.7i0.38-i0.80589565

n=7P(X4Y=1)=i=477i0.7i0.37-i0.873964

03

Step 3:Final answer(part a)

n=9P(X5Y=1)=i=599i0.7i0.39-i0.90119134

n=8P(X5Y=1)=i=588i0.7i0.38-i0.80589565

n=7P(X4Y=1)=i=477i0.7i0.37-i0.873964

04

Step 4:Given information (part b)

In some military courts, 9judges are appointed. However, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are entitled to a peremptory challenge of any judge, in which case that judge is removed from the case and is not replaced. A defendant is declared guilty if the majority of judges cast votes of guilty, and he or she is declared innocent otherwise. Suppose that when the defendant is, in fact, guilty, each judge will (independently) vote guilty with probability.7, whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .3.

05

Step 5:Explanation(part b)

Define random variable Xthat marks the number of jurors that vote that the defendant is guilty and suppose that there are njurors. Also, defineYthat marks whether the defendant is guilty or not.

Similarly as in (a), but here we are given that Y=0. We have that

n=9P(X5Y=0)=i=599i0.3i0.79-i0.09880866

n=8P(X5Y=0)=i=588i0.3i0.78-i0.05796765

n=7P(X4Y=0)=i=477i0.3i0.77-i0.126036

06

Step 6:Final answer(part b)

n=9P(X5Y=0)=i=599i0.3i0.79-i0.09880866

n=8P(X5Y=0)=i=588i0.3i0.78-i0.05796765

n=7P(X4Y=0)=i=477i0.3i0.77-i0.126036

07

Step 7:Given information(part c)

In some military courts, 9judges are appointed. However, both the prosecution and the defense attorneys are entitled to a peremptory challenge of any judge, in which case that judge is removed from the case and is not replaced. A defendant is declared guilty if the majority of judges cast votes of guilty, and he or she is declared innocent otherwise. Suppose that when the defendant is, in fact, guilty, each judge will (independently) vote guilty with probability .7,whereas when the defendant is, in fact, innocent, this probability drops to .3.

If the prosecuting attorney does not exercise the right to a peremptory challenge of a judge, and if the defense is limited to at most two such challenges

08

Explanation(part c)

Define random variable Xthat marks the number of jurors that vote that the defendant is guilty and suppose that there are njurors. Also, defineYthat marks whether the defendant is guilty or not.

09

Step 9:Explanation(part c)

We here have that P(Y=1)=0.6. Let's look if we remove none, one or two jurors. If we do not remove any of them, we have that the defendant will be judged with the probability (input the case n=9)

P(X5Y=0)P(Y=0)+P(X5Y=1)P(Y=1)=0.58

If we remove one juror, we have that (input case n=8)

P(X5Y=0)P(Y=0)+P(X5Y=1)P(Y=1)=0.51

If we remove two jurors, we have that (input case n=7)

P(X4Y=0)P(Y=0)+P(X4Y=1)P(Y=1)=0.57

Observe that the defendant has minimal probability that he will be judged if we remove one juror.

10

Final answer

Defendant has minimal probability that he will be judged if we remove one juror.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Five men and 5 women are ranked according to their scores on an examination. Assume that no two scores are alike and all 10! possible rankings are equally likely. LetXdenote the highest ranking achieved by a woman. (For instance,X=1 if the top-ranked person is female.) FindP{X=i},i=1,2,3,,8,9,10

Consider a roulette wheel consisting of 38 numbers 1 through 36, 0, and double 0. If Smith always bets that the outcome will be one of the numbers 1 through 12, what is the probability that

  1. Smith will lose his first 5 bets;
  2. his first win will occur on his fourth bet?

There are two possible causes for a breakdown of a machine. To check the first possibility would cost C1 dollars, and, if that were the cause of the breakdown, the trouble could be repaired at a cost of R1 dollars. Similarly, there are costs C2 and R2 associated with the second possibility. Let p and 1 − p denote, respectively, the probabilities that the breakdown is caused by the first and second possibilities. Under what conditions on p, Ci, Ri, i = 1, 2, should we check the first possible cause of breakdown and then the second, as opposed to reversing the checking order, so as to minimize the expected cost involved in returning the machine to working order?

Suppose that Xtakes on one of the values0,1and2. If for some constantc,P{X=i}=cP{X=i-1},i=1,2, findE[X].

Suppose that the random variable Xis equal to the number of hits obtained by a certain baseball player in his next 3at-bats. If P{X=1}=3,P{X=2}=2andP{X=0}=3P{X=3}, find E[X].

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free