The heights (cm) in the following table are from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B. Results from two-way analysis of variance are also shown. Use the displayed results and use a 0.05 significance level. What do you conclude?


Female

Male

18-29

161.2

170.2

162.9

155.5

168

153.3

152

154.9

157.4

159.5

172.8

178.7

183.1

175.9

161.8

177.5

170.5

180.1

178.6

30-49

169.1

170.6

171.1

159.6

169.8

169.5

156.5

164

164.8

155

170.1

165.4

178.5

168.5

180.3

178.2

174.4

174.6

162.8

50-80

146.7

160.9

163.3

176.1

163.1

151.6

164.7

153.3

160.3

134.5

181.9

166.6

171.7

170

169.1

182.9

176.3

166.7

166.3

Short Answer

Expert verified

The following conclusions can be drawn.

  • The interaction between age and gender does not have a significant effect on the heights of the subjects.
  • The factor of age does not have a significant effect on the heights of the subjects.
  • The factor of gender has a significant effect on the heights of the subjects.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The ANOVA table is provided for the data given on heights (cm) under two factors: age bracket and gender.

02

Testing the interaction effect

For the given two-way analysis of variance, the following hypotheses are set up.

Null hypothesis: There is no interaction effect between age and gender on heights.

Alternative hypothesis: There is an interaction effect between age and gender on heights.

The ANOVA output shows that the p-value corresponding to the F-statistic value of 1.7970 (under interaction), that is, the row with the header Age*Gender is equal to 0.1756.

As the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded at 0.05 that there is no sufficient evidence that there exists an interaction between the factors of age and gender on height.

As the interaction effect is not significant, the individual effects of age and gender will be tested.

03

Testing the effect of the factor ‘age’

The following hypotheses are set up to test the effect of age on heights.

Null hypothesis: There is no significant effect of age on heights.

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant effect of age on heights.

The ANOVA output shows that the p-value corresponding to the F-statistic value (under age) of 2.0403 is equal to 0.1399 (from the row header ‘Age’).

As the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

It can be concluded that there is no significant evidence to conclude the effect of age on heights.

04

Testing the effect of the factor ‘gender’

The following hypotheses are set up to test the effect of gender on heights.

Null hypothesis: There is no significant effect of gender on heights.

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant effect of gender on heights.

The ANOVA output shows that the p-value corresponding to the F-statistic value (under gender) of 43.4607 is less than 0.0001 (from the row header ‘Gender’).

As the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

It can be concluded that there is a significant effect of gender on heights.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Weights The weights (kg) in the following table are from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B. Results from two-way analysis of variance are also shown. Use the displayed results and use a 0.05 significance level. What do you conclude?


Female

Male

18-29

63.4

57.8

52.6

46.9

61.7

61.5

77.2

50.4

97

76.1

71.6

64.9

144.9

96.4

80.7

84.4

63.9

79

99.4

64.1

30-49

110.5

84.6

133.3

90.2

125.7

105.3

115.5

75.3

92.8

57.7

96.2

56.4

107.4

99.5

64.8

94.7

74.2

112.8

72.6

91.4

50-80

103.2

48.3

87.8

101.3

67.8

45.2

79.8

60.1

68.5

43.3

84.8

127.5

89.9

75.3

110.2

72.3

77.2

86.5

71.3

73.1

Cola Weights Identify the value of the test statistic in the display included with Exercise 1. In general, do larger test statistics result in larger P-values, smaller P-values, or P-values that are unrelated to the value of the test statistic

Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? The accompanying table summarizes randomly selected sample data for San Francisco defendants in burglary cases (based on data from “Does It Pay to Plead Guilty? Differential Sentencing and the Functioning of the Criminal Courts,” by Brereton and Casper, Law and Society Review, Vol. 16, No. 1). All of the subjects had prior prison sentences. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the sentence (sent to prison or not sent to prison) is independent of the plea. If you were an attorney defending a guilty defendant, would these results suggest that you should encourage a guilty plea?


Guilty Plea

Not Guilty Plea

Sent to Prison

392

58

Not Sent to Prison

564

14

Cola Weights The displayed results from Exercise 1 are from one-way analysis of variance. What is it about this test that characterizes it as one-way analysis of variance instead of two-way analysis of variance?

Estimating Length Using the same results displayed in Exercise 8, does it appear that the length estimates are affected by the subject’s major?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free