Estimating Length Using the same results displayed in Exercise 8, does it appear that the length estimates are affected by the sex of the subject?

Short Answer

Expert verified

As the p-value equal to 0.395 is greater than 0.05, it can be concluded that the factor of sex does not significantly affect the visual estimation of the length of the classroom.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The two-way analysis of variance results is shown through the minitab output for estimating the class length using sex and major for 18 students.

Refer to Exercise 8.

02

Analysis of the two-way analysis of variance

The following three effects are analyzed on the target variable, here, estimates.

  • Effect of the interaction term
  • Effect of factor 1, sex
  • Effect of factor 2, major

The null hypothesis to test the significance of the effect of sex is as follows.


There is no significant effect of sex on the length estimates of the classroom.

The value of the F-statistic for the factor ‘sex’ is equal to 0.78.

The corresponding p-value is equal to 0.395.

As the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

Thus, there is not enough evidence to conclude that sex has a significant effect on length estimates.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Arsenic in Rice Listed below are amounts of arsenic in samples of brown rice from three different states. The amounts are in micrograms of arsenic and all samples have the same serving size. The data are from the Food and Drug Administration. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the three samples are from populations with the same mean. Do the amounts of arsenic appear to be different in the different states? Given that the amounts of arsenic in the samples from Texas have the highest mean, can we conclude that brown rice from Texas poses the greatest health problem?

Arkansas

4.8

4.9

5

5.4

5.4

5.4

5.6

5.6

5.6

5.9

6

6.1

California

1.5

3.7

4

4.5

4.9

5.1

5.3

5.4

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.6

Texas

5.6

5.8

6.6

6.9

6.9

6.9

7.1

7.3

7.5

7.6

7.7

7.7

Pancake Experiment Listed below are ratings of pancakes made by experts (based on data from Minitab). Different pancakes were made with and without a supplement and with different amounts of whey. The results from two-way analysis of variance are shown. Use the displayed results and a 0.05 significance level. What do you conclude?

Whey


0%

10%

20%

30%

No Supplement

4.4

4.5

4.3

4.6

4.5

4.8

4.5

4.8

4.8

4.6

4.7

5.1

Supplement

3.3

3.2

3.1

3.8

3.7

3.6

5.0

5.3

4.8

5.4

5.6

5.3

ANOVA The XLSTAT display below results from using the one-way analysis of variance test with the three samples.

a. What is the null hypothesis?

b. Assuming a 0.05 significance level, what conclusion is indicated by the displayed results?

In Exercises 5–16, use analysis of variance for the indicated test.

5. Lead and Verbal IQ Scores Example 1 used measured performance IQ scores for three different blood lead levels. If we use the same three categories of blood lead levels with measured verbal IQ scores, we get the accompanying Minitab display. (The data are listed in Data Set 7 “IQ and Lead” in Appendix B.) Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the three categories of blood lead level have the same mean verbal IQ score. Does exposure to lead appear to have an effect on verbal IQ scores?

Lead and Full IQ Scores Example 1 used measured performance IQ scores for three different blood lead levels. If we use the same three categories of blood lead levels with the fullIQ scores, we get the accompanying Excel display. (The data are listed in Data Set 7 “IQ and Lead” in Appendix B.) Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the three categories of blood lead level have the same mean full IQ score. Does it appear that exposure to lead has an effect on full IQ scores?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free