Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fentanyl) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain Intensity Before Duragesic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6










Pain Intensity After Duragesic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2

1.6

2

2

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1










Correlation Use the given data to construct a scatterplot, then use the methods of Section 10-1 to test for a linear correlation between the pain intensity before and after treatment. If there does appear to be a linear correlation, can we conclude that the drug treatment is effective?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The scatterplot between the two pain intensity value is constructed below:

The value of the linear correlation is equal to 0.304.

The linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment is not significant.

No, it cannot be concluded that the drug is effective in reducing pain even if there was a significant linear correlation between the two pain intensities.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The pain intensities of a group of subjects are recorded before using the drug Duragesic and after using the drug Duragesic.

02

Construction of scatterplot

Follow the given steps to construct a scatterplot between the pain intensities before and after the treatment:

  • Mark the values 0, 2, 4, ……., 12 on the horizontal scale and label the axis as “Pain Intensity Before Treatment”.
  • Mark the values 0, 1, 2, ……., 10 on the vertical scale and label the axis as “Pain Intensity After Treatment”.
  • Plot points on the graph for each value of the pain intensity after treatment for the corresponding value on the pain intensity before treatment.

The following scatterplot is constructed:

The points on the plot appear to be scattered randomly, indicating that there is not a significant linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment.

03

Correlation coefficient

Let x denote the values of the pain intensity before treatment.

Let y denote the values of the pain intensity after treatment.

The formula for computing the correlation coefficient (r) between the values of x and y is as follows:

\(r = \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\)

The following calculations are done to compute the value of r:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

\({y^2}\)

1.2

0.4

0.48

1.44

0.16

1.3

1.4

1.82

1.69

1.96

1.5

1.8

2.7

2.25

3.24

1.6

2.9

4.64

2.56

8.41

8

6

48

64

36

3.4

1.4

4.76

11.56

1.96

3.5

0.7

2.45

12.25

0.49

2.8

3.9

10.92

7.84

15.21

2.6

0.9

2.34

6.76

0.81

2.2

1.8

3.96

4.84

3.24

3

0.9

2.7

9

0.81

7.1

9.3

66.03

50.41

86.49

2.3

8

18.4

5.29

64

2.1

6.8

14.28

4.41

46.24

3.4

2.3

7.82

11.56

5.29

6.4

0.4

2.56

40.96

0.16

5

0.7

3.5

25

0.49

4.2

1.2

5.04

17.64

1.44

2.8

4.5

12.6

7.84

20.25

3.9

2

7.8

15.21

4

5.2

1.6

8.32

27.04

2.56

6.9

2

13.8

47.61

4

6.9

2

13.8

47.61

4

5

6.8

34

25

46.24

5.5

6.6

36.3

30.25

43.56

6

4.1

24.6

36

16.81

5.5

4.6

25.3

30.25

21.16

8.6

2.9

24.94

73.96

8.41

9.4

5.4

50.76

88.36

29.16

10

4.8

48

100

23.04

7.6

4.1

31.16

57.76

16.81

\(\sum x \)=144.9

\(\sum y \)=102.2

\(\sum {xy} \)=533.78

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=866.35

\(\sum {{y^2}} \)=516.4

Substituting the above values, the following value of r is obtained:

\(\begin{aligned} r &= \frac{{n\sum {xy} - \sum x \sum y }}{{\sqrt {n\sum {{x^2}} - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \sqrt {n\sum {{y^2}} - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= \frac{{31\left( {533.78} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {102.2} \right)}}{{\sqrt {31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}} \sqrt {31\left( {516.4} \right) - {{\left( {102.2} \right)}^2}} }}\\ &= 0.304\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of r is equal to 0.304.

04

Significance of r

Here, n=31.

If the value of the correlation coefficient lies between the critical values, then the correlation between the two variables is considered insignificant else, it is considered significant.

The critical values of r for n=31 and\(\alpha = 0.05\)are -0.355 and 0.355.

The corresponding p-value of r is equal to 0.0964.

Since the computed value of r equal to 0.304 lies between the values -0.355 and 0.355, and the p-value is greater than 0.05, it can be said that the correlation between the two variables is not significant.

Therefore, the linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment is not significant.

05

Effectiveness of the drug

Even if there is a significant linear correlation between the pain intensities before and after the treatment, it could not be concluded that the drug is effective in reducing pain. The linear correlation only tells us about the association between the two variables and not about the difference in the values of the two variables and whether the overall value of one variable is lower than the other variable.

A separate kind of hypothesis test needs to be conducted to conclude the effectiveness of the drug.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting a Graph The accompanying graph plots the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing. The graph of the quadratic equation that best fits the data is also shown in red. What feature of the graph justifies the value of\({R^2}\)= 0.255 for the quadratic model?

The following exercises are based on the following sample data consisting of numbers of enrolled students (in thousands) and numbers of burglaries for randomly selected large colleges in a recent year (based on data from the New York Times).

If you had computed the value of the linear correlation coefficient to be 1.500, what should you conclude?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi, gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi, gal).

A Honda Civic weighs 2740 lb, it has an engine displacement of 1.8 L, and its highway fuel consumption is 36 mi/gal. What is the best predicted value of the city fuel consumption? Is that predicted value likely to be a good estimate? Is that predicted value likely to be very accurate?

Terminology Using the lengths (in.), chest sizes (in.), and weights (lb) of bears from Data Set 9 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B, we get this regression equation: Weight = -274 + 0.426 Length +12.1 Chest Size. Identify the response and predictor variables

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free