Confidence Interval for Mean Predicted Value Example 1 in this section illustrated the procedure for finding a prediction interval for an individual value of y. When using a specific value\({x_0}\)for predicting the mean of all values of y, the confidence interval is as follows:

\(\hat y - E < \bar y < \hat y + E\)

where

\(E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \)

The critical value\({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\)is found with n - 2 degrees of freedom. Using the 23 pairs of chocolate/Nobel data from Table 10-1 on page 469 in the Chapter Problem, find a 95% confidence interval estimate of the mean Nobel rate given that the chocolate consumption is 10 kg per capita.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 95% confidence interval for the mean number of Nobel Laureates for the given value of chocolate consumption equal to 10 kgs is (17.1,26.0).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given for two variables “Chocolate Consumption” and “Number of Nobel Laureates”.

Let x denote the variable “Chocolate Consumption”.

Let y denote the variable “Number of Nobel Laureates”.

Referring to Example 1 of section 10-3, the provided information is:

Sample size, n = 23

\({s_e} = {\bf{6}}{\bf{.262665}}\)

\(\hat y = - 3.37 + 2.49x\)

02

Formula of the confidence interval for predicting the mean of all values of y when specific value \({{\bf{x}}_{\bf{0}}}\) is known

The confidence interval for predicting the mean of all values of y by using the specific value\({x_0}\)is as follows:

\(CI = \left( {\hat y - E,\hat y + E} \right)\)

where\(E = {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \)

The critical value \({t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}\) (also known as t multiplies) is found with n - 2 degrees of freedom and the significance level.

03

Predicted value at \(\left( {{x_0}} \right)\)

Substituting the value of\({x_0} = 10\)in the regression equation, the predicted value is obtained as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\hat y &= - 3.37 + 2.49x\\ &= - 3.37 + 2.49\left( {10} \right)\\ &= 21.53\end{aligned}\)

04

Level of significance and degrees of freedom

The following formula is used to compute the level of significance

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\rm{Confidence}}\;{\rm{Level}} &= 95\% \\100\left( {1 - \alpha } \right) &= 95\\1 - \alpha &= 0.95\\ &= 0.05\end{aligned}\)

The degrees of freedom for computing the value of the t-multiplier are shown below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df &= n - 2\\ &= 23 - 2\\ &= 21\end{aligned}\)

The two-tailed value of the t-multiplier for level of significance equal to 0.05 and degrees of freedom equal to 21 is equal to 2.0796.

05

Value of \(\bar x,\)\(\sum {{{\bf{x}}^{\bf{2}}}} \)and \(\sum {\bf{x}} \)

The following calculations are done to compute the \(\sum {{x^2}} \)and \(\sum x \):

The value of\(\bar x\)is computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\bar x &= \frac{{\sum x }}{n}\\ &= \frac{{134.5}}{{23}}\\ &= 5.847826\end{aligned}\)

06

Confidence interval

Substitute the values obtained from above to calculate the value of margin of error (E) as shown:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E &= {t_{\frac{\alpha }{2}}}{s_e}\sqrt {\frac{1}{n} + \frac{{n{{\left( {{x_0} - \bar x} \right)}^2}}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= \left( {2.0796} \right)\left( {6.262665} \right)\sqrt {\frac{1}{{23}} + \frac{{23{{\left( {10 - 5.847826} \right)}^2}}}{{23\left( {1023.05} \right) - {{\left( {134.5} \right)}^2}}}} \\ &= 4.44286\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the confidence interval becomes:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}CI &= \left( {\hat y - E,\hat y + E} \right)\\ &= \left( {21.53 - 4.44286,21.53 + 4.44286} \right)\\ &= \left( {17.0871,25.9729} \right)\\ &= \left( {17.1,26.0} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, 95% confidence interval for the mean number of Nobel Laureates for the given value of chocolate consumption equal to 10 kgs is (17.1, 26.0).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fentanyl) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain Intensity Before Duragesic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6










Pain Intensity After Duragesic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2

1.6

2

2

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1










Matched Pairs The methods of Section 9-3 can be used to test a claim about matched data. Identify the specific claim that the treatment is effective, then use the methods of Section 9-3 to test that claim.

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed lemon/crash data, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Oscars Listed below are ages of Oscar winners matched by the years in which the awards were won (from Data Set 14 “Oscar Winner Age” in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between the ages of Best Actresses and Best Actors? Should we expect that there would be a correlation?

Actress

28

30

29

61

32

33

45

29

62

22

44

54

Actor

43

37

38

45

50

48

60

50

39

55

44

33

Prediction Interval Using the heights and weights described in Exercise 1, a height of 180 cm is used to find that the predicted weight is 91.3 kg, and the 95% prediction interval is (59.0 kg, 123.6 kg). Write a statement that interprets that prediction interval. What is the major advantage of using a prediction interval instead of simply using the predicted weight of 91.3 kg? Why is the terminology of prediction interval used instead of confidence interval?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Sports Diameters (cm), circumferences (cm), and volumes (cm3) from balls used in different sports are listed in the table below. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between diameters and circumferences? Does the scatterplot confirm a linear association?


Diameter

Circumference

Volume

Baseball

7.4

23.2

212.2

Basketball

23.9

75.1

7148.1

Golf

4.3

13.5

41.6

Soccer

21.8

68.5

5424.6

Tennis

7

22

179.6

Ping-Pong

4

12.6

33.5

Volleyball

20.9

65.7

4780.1

Softball

9.7

30.5

477.9

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free