Using the diameter/volume data from the preceding exercise, find the best predicted volume of a marble with a diameter of 1.50 cm. How does the result compare to the actual volume of 1.8 cm3?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation is\(\hat y = - 2010.67 + 347.30x\).

The best predicted volume of marble with a diameter of 1.50 cm is \( - 1489.71\;{\rm{c}}{{\rm{m}}^3}\). The measure of volume cannot be negative, which cannot be compared to the actual volume \(1.8\;{\rm{c}}{{\rm{m}}^3}\).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Values are given on three variables namely, diameter, circumference and volume.

02

Calculate the mean values

Let x represent thediameter.

Let y represent thevolume.

Themean value of xis given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar x = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{x_i}} }}{n}\\ = \frac{{7.4 + 23.9 + .... + 9.7}}{8}\\ = 12.375\end{array}\)

Therefore, the mean value of x is 12.375.

Themean value of yis given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\bar y = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{y_i}} }}{n}\\ = \frac{{212.2 + 7148.1 + .... + 477.9}}{8}\\ = 2287.2\end{array}\)

Therefore, the mean value of y is 2287.2.

03

Calculate the standard deviation of x and y

The standard deviation of x is given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_x} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({x_i} - \bar x)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {7.4 - 12.375} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {23.9 - 12.375} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {9.7 - 12.375} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ = 8.371\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of x is 8.371.

The standard deviation of yis given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{s_y} = \sqrt {\frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{({y_i} - \bar y)}^2}} }}{{n - 1}}} \\ = \sqrt {\frac{{{{\left( {212.2 - 2287.2} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {7148.1 - 2287.2} \right)}^2} + ..... + {{\left( {477.9 - 2287.2} \right)}^2}}}{{8 - 1}}} \\ = 2971.994\end{array}\)

Therefore, the standard deviation of y is 2971.994.

04

Calculate the correlation coefficient

The correlation coefficient is given as,

\(r = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\left( {n\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \right)\left( {\left( {n\sum {{y^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} \right)} }}\)

The calculations required to compute the correlation coefficient are as follows:

The correlation coefficient is given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}r = \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\left( {n\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}} \right)\left( {\left( {n\sum {{y^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum y } \right)}^2}} \right)} }}\\ = \frac{{8\left( {396776} \right) - \left( {99} \right)\left( {18297.6} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {\left( {8 \times 1715.6} \right) - {{\left( {99} \right)}^2}} \right)\left( {\left( {8 \times 103679501} \right) - {{\left( {18297.6} \right)}^2}} \right)} }}\\ = 0.9782\end{array}\)

Therefore, the correlation coefficient is 0.9782.

05

Calculate the slope of the regression line

The slopeof the regression line is given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_1} = r\frac{{{s_Y}}}{{{s_X}}}\\ = 0.9782 \times \frac{{2971.994}}{{8.371}}\\ = 347.30\end{array}\)

Therefore, the value of slope is 347.30.

06

Calculate the intercept of the regression line

The interceptis computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}{b_0} = \bar y - {b_1}\bar x\\ = 2287.2 - \left( {347.30 \times 12.375} \right)\\ = - 2010.67\end{array}\)

Therefore, the value of intercept is -2010.67.

07

Form a regression equation

Theregression equationis given as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ = - 2010.67 + 347.30x\end{array}\)

Thus, the regression equation is \(\hat y = - 2010.67 + 347.67x\).

08

Analyze the model

Referring to exercise 28 of section 10-1,

1)The scatter plot shows a linear relationship between the variables.

2)The P-value is 0.000.

As the P-value is less than the level of significance (0.05), this implies the null hypothesis is rejected.

Therefore, the correlation is significant.

Referring to figure 10-5, the criteria for good regression model are satisfied.

Therefore, the regression equation can be used to predict the value of y.

The best predicted volume of marble with a diameter of 1.50 cm is computed as,

\(\begin{array}{c}\hat y = - 2010.67 + \left( {347.30 \times 1.50} \right)\\ = - 1489.71\end{array}\)

Therefore, thebest predicted volume of marble with a diameter of 1.50 cm is

\( - 1489.71\;{\rm{c}}{{\rm{m}}^3}\).

09

Compare the result with the actual volume of 1.8

Since the predicted volume of marble witha diameter of 1.50 cm is negative, this makes no sense.

Therefore, there is no comparison between the predicted and actual volume.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting r For the same two variables described in Exercise 1, if we find that r = 0, does that indicate that there is no association between those two variables?

Interpreting r. In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the accompanying displays.

5. Bear Weight and Chest Size Fifty-four wild bears were anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in Data Set 9 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B; results are shown in the accompanying Statdisk display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest sizes? When measuring an anesthetized bear, is it easier to measure chest size than weight? If so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the weight?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Internet and Nobel Laureates Listed below are numbers of Internet users per 100 people and numbers of Nobel Laureates per 10 million people (from Data Set 16 “Nobel Laureates and Chocolate” in Appendix B) for different countries. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between Internet users and Nobel Laureates?

Internet Users

Nobel Laureates

79.5

5.5

79.6

9

56.8

3.3

67.6

1.7

77.9

10.8

38.3

0.1

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

Head widths (in.) and weights (lb) were measured for 20 randomly selected bears (from Data Set 9 “Bear Measurements” in Appendix B). The 20 pairs of measurements yield\(\bar x = 6.9\)in.,\(\bar y = 214.3\)lb, r= 0.879, P-value = 0.000, and\(\hat y = - 212 + 61.9x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(weight) given a bear with a head width of 6.5 in.

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9–12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, Stat Crunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.


Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free