Critical Thinking: Is the pain medicine Duragesic effective in reducing pain? Listed below are measures of pain intensity before and after using the drug Duragesic (fontanels) (based on data from Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P.). The data are listed in order by row, and corresponding measures are from the same subject before and after treatment. For example, the first subject had a measure of 1.2 before treatment and a measure of 0.4 after treatment. Each pair of measurements is from one subject, and the intensity of pain was measured using the standard visual analog score. A higher score corresponds to higher pain intensity.

Pain intensity before Duragestic Treatment

1.2

1.3

1.5

1.6

8

3.4

3.5

2.8

2.6

2.2

3

7.1

2.3

2.1

3.4

6.4

5

4.2

2.8

3.9

5.2

6.9

6.9

5

5.5

6

5.5

8.6

9.4

10

7.6

Pain intensity after Duragestic Treatment

0.4

1.4

1.8

2.9

6.0

1.4

0.7

3.9

0.9

1.8

0.9

9.3

8.0

6.8

2.3

0.4

0.7

1.2

4.5

2.0

1.6

2.0

2.0

6.8

6.6

4.1

4.6

2.9

5.4

4.8

4.1

Regression:Use the given data to find the equation of the regression line. Let the response (y) variable be the pain intensity after treatment. What would be the equation of the regression line for a treatment having absolutely no effect?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The regression equation with pain intensity after treatment as the response variable is equal to\(\hat y = 1.9103 + 0.2966x\).

The regression equation for the treatment having absolutely no effect is equal to \(\hat y = 2.00 + 0x\).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The value of the measures of pain intensity before Duragesic treatment and after Duragesic treatment are considered.

02

Define the variables and the regression line

Let x represent thepain intensity before Duragesic treatment

Let y represent the painintensity afterDuragesic treatment

Here, y is the response variable, and x is the predictor variable

The regression line of y on x has the following expression:

\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}x\)where

\({b_0}\) is the intercept term

\({b_1}\) is the slope coefficient

03

Show the necessary calculations

The following table shows the required computations to compute the regression line:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

1.2

0.4

0.48

1.44

1.3

1.4

1.82

1.69

1.5

1.8

2.70

2.25

1.6

2.9

4.64

2.56

8.0

6.0

48.00

64.00

3.4

1.4

4.76

11.56

3.5

0.7

2.45

12.25

2.8

3.9

10.92

7.84

2.6

0.9

2.34

6.76

2.2

1.8

3.96

4.84

3.0

0.9

2.70

9.00

7.1

9.3

66.03

50.41

2.3

8.0

18.40

5.29

2.1

6.8

14.28

4.41

3.4

2.3

7.82

11.56

6.4

0.4

2.56

40.96

5.0

0.7

3.50

25.00

4.2

1.2

5.04

17.64

2.8

4.5

12.60

7.84

3.9

2.0

7.80

15.21

5.2

1.6

8.32

27.04

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

5.0

6.8

34.00

25.00

5.5

6.6

36.30

30.25

6.0

4.1

24.60

36.00

5.5

4.6

25.30

30.25

8.6

2.9

24.94

73.96

9.4

5.4

50.76

88.36

10.0

4.8

48.00

100.00

7.6

4.1

31.16

57.76

\(\sum {x = } \)144.9

\(\sum {y = } \)102.2

\(\sum {xy} = \)533.78

\(\sum {{x^2}} = \)866.35

04

Calculate the slope of the regression line

The slopeof the regression lineis computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_1} &= \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{31\left( {533.78} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {102.2} \right)}}{{31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 0.2966\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of the slope coefficient is 0.2966.

05

Calculate the intercept of the regression line

The interceptis computed as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_0} &= \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( {102.2} \right)\left( {866.35} \right) - \left( {144.9} \right)\left( {533.78} \right)}}{{31\left( {866.35} \right) - {{\left( {144.9} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 1.9103\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the value of the intercept is 1.9103.

06

Regression equation

Theregression equationis given as follows:

\(\begin{aligned} \hat y &= {b_0} + {b_1}x\\ &= 1.9103 + 0.2966x\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation is \(\hat y = 1.9103 + 0.2966x\).

07

Regression equation when the treatment has no effect

If Duragesic treatment has no effect, then the values of the pain intensities before and after the treatment will be equal.

In the given data, the following two pairs of data have the same pain intensities before and after the treatment:

x

y

xy

\({x^2}\)

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

6.9

2.0

13.80

47.61

\(\sum x \)=13.8

\(\sum y \)=4

\(\sum {xy} \)=27.60

\(\sum {{x^2}} \)=95.22

Now, the modified slope coefficient is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{b_1} &= \frac{{n\left( {\sum {xy} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum y } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{2\left( {27.60} \right) - \left( {13.8} \right)\left( 4 \right)}}{{2\left( {95.22} \right) - {{\left( {13.8} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 0\end{aligned}\)

The modified intercept term is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned} {b_0} &= \frac{{\left( {\sum y } \right)\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - \left( {\sum x } \right)\left( {\sum {xy} } \right)}}{{n\left( {\sum {{x^2}} } \right) - {{\left( {\sum x } \right)}^2}}}\\ &= \frac{{\left( 4 \right)\left( {95.22} \right) - \left( {13.8} \right)\left( {27.60} \right)}}{{4\left( {95.22} \right) - {{\left( {13.8} \right)}^2}}}\\ &= 2.00\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the regression equation when the treatment has no effect is as follows:

\(\hat y = 2.00 + 0x\)

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9–12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, StatCrunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.

Testing for Correlation Use the information provided in the display to determine the value of the linear correlation coefficient. Is there sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between numbers of registered boats and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats?

Best Multiple Regression Equation For the regression equation given in Exercise 1, the P-value is 0.000 and the adjusted \({R^2}\)value is 0.925. If we were to include an additional predictor variable of neck size (in.), the P-value becomes 0.000 and the adjusted\({R^2}\)becomes 0.933. Given that the adjusted \({R^2}\)value of 0.933 is larger than 0.925, is it better to use the regression equation with the three predictor variables of length, chest size, and neck size? Explain.

Prediction Interval Using the heights and weights described in Exercise 1, a height of 180 cm is used to find that the predicted weight is 91.3 kg, and the 95% prediction interval is (59.0 kg, 123.6 kg). Write a statement that interprets that prediction interval. What is the major advantage of using a prediction interval instead of simply using the predicted weight of 91.3 kg? Why is the terminology of prediction interval used instead of confidence interval?

Time and Motion In a physics experiment at Doane College, a soccer ball was thrown upward from the bed of a moving truck. The table below lists the time (sec) that has lapsed from the throw and the height (m) of the soccer ball. What do you conclude about the relationship between time and height? What horrible mistake would be easy to make if the analysis is conducted without a scatterplot?

Time (sec)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Height (m)

0.0

1.7

3.1

3.9

4.5

4.7

4.6

4.1

3.3

2.1

Effects of an Outlier Refer to the Minitab-generated scatterplot given in Exercise 11 of

Section 10-1 on page 485.

a. Using the pairs of values for all 10 points, find the equation of the regression line.

b. After removing the point with coordinates (10, 10), use the pairs of values for the remaining 9 points and find the equation of the regression line.

c. Compare the results from parts (a) and (b).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free