Interpreting a Graph The accompanying graph plots the numbers of points scored in each Super Bowl to the last Super Bowl at the time of this writing. The graph of the quadratic equation that best fits the data is also shown in red. What feature of the graph justifies the value of\({R^2}\)= 0.255 for the quadratic model?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Since a lot of points on the graph are away from the fitted line representing the quadratic equation, it justifies the value of \({R^2} = 0.255\), which is very low indicating that the quadratic model does not describe the relationship between the two variables well.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The relation between y (number of points scored in Super Bowl) and x (years starting from 1980 and coded as 1,2,3…..) is modelled using a quadratic model with \({R^2}\) value equal to 0.255. the graph of the values is plotted.

02

Interpretation of \({R^2}\)using scatter plot

A scatterplot of the two variables depicts the pattern of the relationship between the two variables.

Here, a scatterplot is plotted between the two variables with “year” on the horizontal scale and “number of points scored” on the vertical scale.

The quadratic equation of the two variables is fitted and plotted using a red line.

If the data points lie close to the line, then the relation between the two variables is well modelled by the quadratic equation.

If the data points lie far from the line, then the relation between the two variables is poorly modelled by the quadratic equation.

Here, the value of\({R^2}\)equal to 0.255 (close to 0) for the quadratic model indicates that the relation between the number of points scored and the year is poorly represented by the quadratic equation.

Moreover, upon observing the scatterplot,it can be seen that the points do not lie close to the red line.

Thus, it can be concluded that the fitted quadratic model does not appropriately represent the relationship between the number of points scored and the year.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

CSI Statistics Police sometimes measure shoe prints at crime scenes so that they can learn something about criminals. Listed below are shoe print lengths, foot lengths, and heights of males (from Data Set 2 “Foot and Height” in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between shoe print lengths and heights of males? Based on these results, does it appear that police can use a shoe print length to estimate the height of a male?

Shoe print(cm)

29.7

29.7

31.4

31.8

27.6

Foot length(cm)

25.7

25.4

27.9

26.7

25.1

Height (cm)

175.3

177.8

185.4

175.3

172.7

Interpreting a Computer Display. In Exercises 9–12, refer to the display obtained by using the paired data consisting of Florida registered boats (tens of thousands) and numbers of manatee deaths from encounters with boats in Florida for different recent years (from Data Set 10 in Appendix B). Along with the paired boat, manatee sample data, StatCrunch was also given the value of 85 (tens of thousands) boats to be used for predicting manatee fatalities.

Finding a Prediction Interval For a year with 850,000 (x = 852) registered boats in Florida, identify the 95% prediction interval estimate of the number of manatee fatalities resulting from encounters with boats. Write a statement interpreting that interval.

Prediction Interval Using the heights and weights described in Exercise 1, a height of 180 cm is used to find that the predicted weight is 91.3 kg, and the 95% prediction interval is (59.0 kg, 123.6 kg). Write a statement that interprets that prediction interval. What is the major advantage of using a prediction interval instead of simply using the predicted weight of 91.3 kg? Why is the terminology of prediction interval used instead of confidence interval?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the accompanying table, which was obtained using the data from 21 cars listed in Data Set 20 “Car Measurements” in Appendix B. The response (y) variable is CITY (fuel consumption in mi/gal). The predictor (x) variables are WT (weight in pounds), DISP (engine displacement in liters), and HWY (highway fuel consumption in mi/gal).

If only one predictor (x) variable is used to predict the city fuel consumption, which single variable is best? Why?

In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free