In Exercises 5–8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to theStatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 “Family Heights” in Appendix B.

Identify the multiple regression equation that expresses the height of a son in terms of the height of his father and mother.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The multiple regression equation is

\({\rm{Son}} = 18 + 0.504\;{\rm{Father}} + 0.277\;{\rm{Mother}}\).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The analysis of the variance table for the multiple regression model is provided.

02

State the general equation of multiple regression

The multiple regression equation is

\(\hat y = {b_0} + {b_1}{x_1} + {b_2}{x_2} + ... + {b_n}{x_n}\), where \(\hat y\) is the predicted response variable and \({x_1},{x_2},...,{x_n}\)are the independent variables along with respective measure of coefficients \({b_0},{b_1},...,{b_n}\).

03

Compute the equation of multiple regression

Define the variables as follows:

Father: Height of father

Mother: Height of mother

Son: Height of son

From the output, the estimates of the variables are

\(\begin{array}{l}{b_0} = 17.96657,\\{b_1} = 0.50354896,\\{b_2} = 0.27714316.\end{array}\)

The multiple regression equation for the provided scenario is represented below:

\(\begin{array}{c}Son = {b_0} + {b_1}\;{\rm{Father}} + {b_2}\;{\rm{Mother}}\\ = 17.9666 + 0.504\;{\rm{Father}} + 0.277\;{\rm{Mother}}\end{array}\)

Therefore, the multiple regression equation is

\({\rm{Son}} = 18.0 + 0.504\;{\rm{Father}} + 0.277\;{\rm{Mother}}\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level 0.05 and refer to theaccompanying displays.Cereal Killers The amounts of sugar (grams of sugar per gram of cereal) and calories (per gram of cereal) were recorded for a sample of 16 different cereals. TI-83>84 Plus calculator results are shown here. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between sugar and calories in a gram of cereal? Explain.

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed lemon/crash data, find the best predicted crash fatality rate for a year in which there are 500 metric tons of lemon imports. Is the prediction worthwhile?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

POTUS Media periodically discuss the issue of heights of winning presidential candidates and heights of their main opponents. Listed below are those heights (cm) from severalrecent presidential elections (from Data Set 15 “Presidents” in Appendix B). Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between heights of winning presidential candidates and heights of their main opponents? Should there be such a correlation?

President

178

182

188

175

179

183

192

182

177

185

188

188

183

188

Opponent

180

180

182

173

178

182

180

180

183

177

173

188

185

175

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Using the listed old/new mpg ratings, find the best predicted new

mpg rating for a car with an old rating of 30 mpg. Is there anything to suggest that the prediction is likely to be quite good?

Testing for a Linear Correlation. In Exercises 13–28, construct a scatterplot, and find the value of the linear correlation coefficient r. Also find the P-value or the critical values of r from Table A-6. Use a significance level of A = 0.05. Determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a claim of a linear correlation between the two variables. (Save your work because the same data sets will be used in Section 10-2 exercises.)

Manatees Listed below are numbers of registered pleasure boats in Florida (tens of thousands) and the numbers of manatee fatalities from encounters with boats in Florida for each of several recent years. The values are from Data Set 10 “Manatee Deaths” in Appendix B. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a linear correlation between numbers of registered pleasure boats and numbers of manatee boat fatalities?

Pleasure Boats

99

99

97

95

90

90

87

90

90

Manatee Fatalities

92

73

90

97

83

88

81

73

68

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free