Cell Phones and Driving In the author’s home town of Madison, CT, there were 2733 police traffic stops in a recent year, and 7% of them were attributable to improper use of cell phones. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population in which fewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 2733 police traffic stops, 7% were due to improper use of cell phones.

02

z-test

The z-test is used to test whether the sample proportion is equal to the given value of proportion.

03

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is as follows:

The sample proportion of traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is equal to 10%.

\({H_0}:P = 0.10\)


The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The sample proportion of traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is equal to 10%.

\({H_0}:P < 0.10\)

The test is left-tailed.

If the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value, the null hypothesis is rejected.

04

Important computations

Sample proportion (p) of the traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is given to be equal to 7% or 0.07.

Population proportion (P) of the traffic stops due to improper use of cell phones is given to be equal to 10% or 0.10.

Thus, the population proportion (Q) of the traffic stops that were due to reasons other than improper use of cell phones is given as:

\(\begin{aligned} Q &= 1 - P\\ &= 1 - 0.10\\ &= 0.90\end{aligned}\)

The sample size (n) is equal to 2733.

05

Test statistic

The test statistic value is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned} z &= \frac{{p - P}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{PQ}}{n}} }}\;\; \sim N\left( {0,1} \right)\\ &= \frac{{0.07 - 0.10}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{\left( {0.10} \right)\left( {0.90} \right)}}{{2733}}} }}\\ &= - 5.2278\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the test statistic is – 5.2278.

06

Critical value and p-value

The critical value of z corresponding\(\alpha = 0.05\)for a left-tailed test is equal to -1.6449.

By using the standard normal table, the p-value is 0.000.

Since the absolute value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

07

Conclusion

There is enough evidence to support the claim thatfewer than 10% of police traffic stops are attributable to improper cell phone use.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercises 5–8, we want to consider the correlation between heights of fathers and mothers and the heights of their sons. Refer to theStatCrunch display and answer the given questions or identify the indicated items.

The display is based on Data Set 5 “Family Heights” in Appendix B.

Identify the multiple regression equation that expresses the height of a son in terms of the height of his father and mother.

In Exercises 5–8, use a significance level of A = 0.05 and refer to the

accompanying displays.

Casino Size and Revenue The New York Times published the sizes (square feet) and revenues (dollars) of seven different casinos in Atlantic City. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between size and revenue? Do the results suggest that a casino can increase its revenue by expanding its size?

let the predictor variable x be the first variable given. Use the given data to find the regression equation and the best predicted value of the response variable. Be sure to follow the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493. Use a 0.05 significance level.

For 50 randomly selected speed dates, attractiveness ratings by males of their

female date partners (x) are recorded along with the attractiveness ratings by females of their male date partners (y); the ratings are from Data Set 18 “Speed Dating” in Appendix B. The 50 paired ratings yield\(\bar x = 6.5\),\(\bar y = 5.9\), r= -0.277, P-value = 0.051, and\(\hat y = 8.18 - 0.345x\). Find the best predicted value of\(\hat y\)(attractiveness rating by female of male) for a date in which the attractiveness rating by the male of the female is x= 8.

Exercises 13–28 use the same data sets as Exercises 13–28 in Section 10-1. In each case, find the regression equation, letting the first variable be the predictor (x) variable. Find the indicated predicted value by following the prediction procedure summarized in Figure 10-5 on page 493.

Use the pizza costs and subway fares to find the best predicted

subway fare, given that the cost of a slice of pizza is $3.00. Is the best predicted subway fare likely to be implemented?

Interpreting the Coefficient of Determination. In Exercises 5–8, use the value of the linear correlation coefficient r to find the coefficient of determination and the percentage of the total variation that can be explained by the linear relationship between the two variables.

Pizza and Subways r = 0.992 (x = cost of a slice of pizza, y = subway fare in New York City

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free