Do World War II Bomb Hits Fit a Poisson Distribution? In analyzing hits by V-1 buzz bombs in World War II, South London was subdivided into regions, each with an area of 0.25\(k{m^2}\). Shown below is a table of actual frequencies of hits and the frequencies expected with the Poisson distribution. (The Poisson distribution is described in Section 5-3.) Use the values listed and a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the actual frequencies fit a Poisson distribution. Does the result prove that the data conform to the Poisson distribution?

Number of Bomb Hits

0

1

2

3

4

Actual Number of Regions

229

211

93

35

8

Expected Number of Regions

(from Poisson Distribution)

227.5

211.4

97.9

30.5

8.7

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is not enough evidence to conclude that theobserved frequencies of bomb hits do not fit well with the Poisson distribution.

Therefore, the given data conforms to the Poisson distribution.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The observed and expected frequencies of bomb hits in different regions are provided.

02

Check the requirements

Let O denote the observed frequencies of hits.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_0} = 229\\{O_1} = 211\\{O_2} = 93\\{O_3} = 35\\{O_4} = 8\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies.

The expected frequencies are noted below:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{E_0} = 227.5\\{E_1} = 211.4\\{E_2} = 97.9\\{E_3} = 30.5\\{E_4} = 8.7\end{aligned}\)

It is observed that each of the frequencies is greater than 5.

Thus, the requirements for the test are satisfied, assuming the sampling is done randomly.

03

State the hypotheses

The hypotheses are,

\({H_0}:\)The observed frequencies of bomb hits fit well with the Poisson distribution.

\({H_a}:\)The observed frequencies of bomb hits do not fit well with the Poisson distribution.

The test is right-tailed.

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Bomb Hits

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

0

229

227.5

1.5

2.25

0.00989

1

211

211.4

-0.4

0.16

0.000757

2

93

97.9

-4.9

24.01

0.24525

3

35

30.5

4.5

20.25

0.66393

4

8

8.7

-0.7

0.49

0.05632

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \;\\ = 0.00989 + 0.000757 + ...... + 0.056322\\ = 0.976\end{aligned}\)

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 0.976\).

Let k be the different number of bomb hits, which is equal to 5.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 5 - 1\\ = 4\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.05\)with 4 degrees of freedom is equal to 9.4877.

The p-value is equal to,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 0.976} \right)\\ = 0.913\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is less than the critical value and the p-value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

04

State the conclusion

There is not enough evidence to conclude that theobserved frequencies of bomb hits do not fit well with the Poisson distribution.

Therefore, the given data conforms to the Poisson distribution.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Weather-Related Deaths Review Exercise 5 involved weather-related U.S. deaths. Among the 450 deaths included in that exercise, 320 are males. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that among those who die in weather-related deaths, the percentage of males is equal to 50%. Provide an explanation for the results.

Winning team data were collected for teams in different sports, with the results given in the table on the top of the next page (based on data from “Predicting Professional Sports Game Outcomes fromIntermediateGame Scores,” by Copper, DeNeve, and Mosteller, Chance,Vol. 5, No. 3–4). Use a 0.10significance level to test the claim that home/visitor wins are independent of the sport. Given that among the four sports included here, baseball is the only sport in which the home team canmodify field dimensions to favor its own players, does it appear that baseball teams are effective in using this advantage?

Basketball

Baseball

Hockey

Football

Home Team Wins

127

53

50

57

Visiting Team Wins

71

47

43

42

Forward Grip Reach and Ergonomics When designing cars and aircraft, we must consider the forward grip reach of women. Women have normally distributed forward grip reaches with a mean of 686 mm and a standard deviation of 34 mm (based on anthropometric survey data from Gordon, Churchill, et al.).

a. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by 95% of women, what is the shortest forward grip reach that can access the dashboard?

b. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm, what percentage of women cannot reach the dashboard? Is that percentage too high?

c. Find the probability that 16 randomly selected women have forward grip reaches with a mean greater than 680 mm. Does this result have any effect on the design?

Chocolate and Happiness Use the results from part (b) of Cumulative Review Exercise 2 to test the claim that when asked, more than 80% of women say that chocolate makes them happier. Use a 0.01 significance level.

In Exercises 1–4, use the following listed arrival delay times (minutes) for American Airline flights from New York to Los Angeles. Negative values correspond to flights that arrived early. Also shown are the SPSS results for analysis of variance. Assume that we plan to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the different flights have the same mean arrival delay time.

Flight 1

-32

-25

-26

-6

5

-15

-17

-36

Flight 19

-5

-32

-13

-9

-19

49

-30

-23

Flight 21

-23

28

103

-19

-5

-46

13

-3

P-Value If we use a 0.05 significance level in analysis of variance with the sample data given in Exercise 1, what is the P-value? What should we conclude? If a passenger abhors late flight arrivals, can that passenger be helped by selecting one of the flights?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free