In Exercises 5–20, conduct the hypothesis test and provide the test statistic and the P-value and, or critical value, and state the conclusion.

Police Calls Repeat Exercise 11 using these observed frequencies for police calls received during the month of March: Monday (208); Tuesday (224); Wednesday (246); Thursday (173); Friday (210); Saturday (236); Sunday (154). What is a fundamental error with this analysis?

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude that the police calls do not occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

Because March has 31 days, there is a fundamental inaccuracy in the presented observations: not all of the days occur an equal number of times. Some days will appear four times in a month, while others will appear five times.

As a result, the number of calls on days that occur 5 times will be higher than on other days. As a result, the provided analysis does not appear to be very applicable.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The observed frequencies of the police calls on the 7 days of the week of in March are recorded.

It is expected that the calls occur equally frequently on the 7 days of the week.

02

Check the requirements

Assume the recordings are taken from randomly selected experimental units.

Let the serial numbers from 1 to 7 denote the seven days of the week starting from Monday.

Let O denote the observed frequencies of the police calls.

The following values are obtained:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}{O_1} = 208\\{O_2} = 224\\{O_3} = 246\\{O_4} = 173\\{O_5} = 210\\{O_6} = 236\\{O_7} = 154\end{aligned}\)

The sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 208 + 224 + .... + 154\\ = 1451\end{aligned}\)

Let E denote the expected frequencies. It is given that the days are expected to occur with the same frequency on each day.

The expected frequencies for each of the 7 days are equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = \frac{{1451}}{7}\\ = 207.2857\end{aligned}\)

As the expected frequencies are all greater than 5, the requirements of the test are satisfied.

03

State the hypotheses

The null hypothesis for conducting the given test is as follows:

The police calls occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

The police calls do not occur equally frequently on the different days of the week.

04

Compute the test statistic

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

Day

O

E

\(\left( {O - E} \right)\)

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

Monday

208

207.2857

0.714286

0.510204

0.002461

Tuesday

224

207.2857

16.71429

279.3673

1.34774

Wednesday

246

207.2857

38.71429

1498.796

7.23058

Thursday

173

207.2857

-34.2857

1175.51

5.670966

Friday

210

207.2857

2.714286

7.367347

0.035542

Saturday

236

207.2857

28.71429

824.5102

3.977651

Sunday

154

207.2857

-53.2857

2839.367

13.69784

The value of the test statistic is equal to:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \;\\ = 0.002461 + 1.34774 + ... + 13.69784\\ = 31.96278\end{aligned}\]

Thus,\({\chi ^2} = 31.963\).

Let k be the number of days which are 7.

The degrees of freedom for\({\chi ^2}\)is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = k - 1\\ = 7 - 1\\ = 6\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)at\(\alpha = 0.01\)with 6 degrees of freedom is equal to 16.812.

The p-value is equal to,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p - value = P\left( {{\chi ^2} > 31.963} \right)\\ = 0.000\end{aligned}\)

Since the test statistic value is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected.

05

State the conclusion

There is enough evidence to conclude that the police calls do not occur evenly on the different days of the week.

06

Error in the analysis

A fundamental error in the given observations is that not all the days occur an equal number of times because March has 31 days. Some days will occur 4 times while others will occur 5 times in the month.

Thus, the number of calls on the days that occur 5 times will be more as compared to the other days.

So, the given analysis does not seem appropriate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Clinical Trial of Lipitor Lipitor is the trade name of the drug atorvastatin, which is used to reduce cholesterol in patients. (Until its patent expired in 2011, this was the largest-selling drug in the world, with annual sales of $13 billion.) Adverse reactions have been studied in clinical trials, and the table below summarizes results for infections in patients from different treatment groups (based on data from Parke-Davis). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that getting an infection is independent of the treatment. Does the atorvastatin (Lipitor) treatment appear to have an effect on infections?


Placebo

Atorvastatin 10 mg

Atorvastatin 40 mg

Atorvastatin 80 mg

Infection

27

89

8

7

No Infection

243

774

71

87

A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the effectiveness of splinting versus surgery in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Results are given in the table below (based on data from “Splinting vs. Surgery in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome,” by Gerritsen et al., Journal of the American Medical Association,Vol. 288,

No. 10). The results are based on evaluations made one year after the treatment. Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that success is independent of the type of treatment. What do the results suggest about treating carpal tunnel syndrome?

Successful Treatment

Unsuccessful Treatment

Splint Treatment

60

23

Surgery Treatment

67

6

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Author’s Check Amounts Exercise 21 lists the observed frequencies of leading digits from amounts on checks from seven suspect companies. Here are the observed frequencies of the leading digits from the amounts on the most recent checks written by the author at the time this exercise was created: 83, 58, 27, 21, 21, 21, 6, 4, 9. (Those observed frequencies correspond to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively.) Using a 0.01 significance level, test the claim that these leading digits are from a population of leading digits that conform to Benford’s law. Does the conclusion change if the significance level is 0.05?

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

Is the hypothesis test left-tailed, right-tailed, or two-tailed?

In a clinical trial of the effectiveness of echinacea for preventing

colds, the results in the table below were obtained (based on data from “An Evaluation of Echinacea Angustifoliain Experimental Rhinovirus Infections,” by Turner et al., NewEngland Journal of Medicine,Vol. 353, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that getting a cold is independent of the treatment group. What do the results suggest about the

effectiveness of echinacea as a prevention against colds?

Treatment Group


Placebo

Echinacea:

20% Extract

Echinacea:

60% Extract

Got a Cold

88

48

42

Did Not Get a Cold

15

4

10

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free