Cybersecurity The table below lists leading digits of 317 inter-arrival Internet traffic times for a computer, along with the frequencies of leading digits expected with Benford’s law (from Table 11-1 in the Chapter Problem).

a. Identify the notation used for observed and expected values.

b. Identify the observed and expected values for the leading digit of 2.

c. Use the results from part (b) to find the contribution to the\({\chi ^2}\)test statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2.

Leading Digit

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Benford’s

Law

30.1%

17.6%

12.5%

9.7%

7.9%

6.7%

5.8%

5.1%

4.6%

Leading Digits

of Inter-Arrival

Traffic Times

76

62

29

33

19

27

28

21

22

Short Answer

Expert verified

a.The notation used for the observed frequencies is O and the notation used for the expected frequencies is E.

b.The observed frequency for the leading digit of 2 is equal to 62 and the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is equal to 55.792.

c. The value of\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)is equal to 0.691.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The observed frequencies and the expected frequencies of the leading digits of inter-arrival traffic times are tabulated.

02

Notation for observed and expected frequency

a.

The observed frequencies are represented by O.

The expected frequencies are represented by E.

03

Identify the observed and expected frequency for the leading digit 2

b.

The observed frequency (O) corresponding to the leading digit of 2 is equal to 62.

The formula to compute the expected frequency is as follows:

\(E = np\)where

n is the sum of all observed frequencies

p is the probability of occurrence of that outcome.

Here, the sum of all observed frequencies is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 76 + 62 + ..... + 22\\ = 317\end{aligned}\)

The value of p for the leading digit of 2 is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}p = 17.6\% \\ = \frac{{17.6}}{{100}}\\ = 0.176\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = np\\ = 317\left( {0.176} \right)\\ = 55.792\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the expected frequency of the leading digit of 2 is equal to 55.792.

04

Contribution to the test statistic

c.

The contribution to thechi-squaretest statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2 is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E} = \frac{{{{\left( {62 - 55.792} \right)}^2}}}{{55.792}}\\ = 0.6907\\ \approx 0.691\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the contribution to the chi-squaretest statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2 is equal to 0.691.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Forward Grip Reach and Ergonomics When designing cars and aircraft, we must consider the forward grip reach of women. Women have normally distributed forward grip reaches with a mean of 686 mm and a standard deviation of 34 mm (based on anthropometric survey data from Gordon, Churchill, et al.).

a. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by 95% of women, what is the shortest forward grip reach that can access the dashboard?

b. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm, what percentage of women cannot reach the dashboard? Is that percentage too high?

c. Find the probability that 16 randomly selected women have forward grip reaches with a mean greater than 680 mm. Does this result have any effect on the design?

Alert nurses at the Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center in Northampton, Massachusetts, noticed an unusually high number of deaths at times when another nurse, Kristen Gilbert, was working. Those same nurses later noticed missing supplies of the drug epinephrine, which is a synthetic adrenaline that stimulates the heart. Kristen Gilbert was arrested and charged with four counts of murder and two counts of attempted murder. When seeking a grand jury indictment, prosecutors provided a key piece of evidence consisting of the table below. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the defense claim that deaths on shifts are independent of whether Gilbert was working. What does the result suggest about the guilt or innocence of Gilbert?

Shifts With a Death

Shifts Without a Death

Gilbert Was Working

40

217

Gilbert Was Not Working

34

1350

The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts (Boise State University) and Gordon H. Barland (Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). In each case, it was known if the subject lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truths and lies?

Did the subject Actually Lie?


No (Did Not Lie)

Yes (Lied)

Polygraph test indicates that the subject lied.


15

42

Polygraph test indicates that the subject did not lied.


32

9

A study of seat belt users andnonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the given table (based on data from “What Kinds of People Do Not Use Seat Belts?” by Helsing and Comstock, American Journal of Public Health,Vol. 67, No. 11). Test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. A plausible theory is that people who smoke more are lessconcerned about their health and safety and are therefore less inclined to wear seat belts. Is this theory supported by the sample data?

Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day

0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Wear Seat Belts

175

20

42

6

Don't Wear Seat Belts

149

17

41

9

One Big Bill or Many Smaller Bills In a study of the “denomination effect,” 150 women in China were given either a single 100 yuan bill or a total of 100 yuan in smaller bills. The value of 100 yuan is about $15. The women were given the choice of spending the money on specific items or keeping the money. The results are summarized in the table below (based on “The Denomination Effect,” by Priya Raghubir and Joydeep Srivastava, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the form of the 100 yuan is independent of whether the money was spent. What does the result suggest about a denomination effect?

Spent the Money

Kept the Money

Women Given a Single 100-Yuan Bill

60

15

Women Given 100 Yuan in Smaller Bills

68

7

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free