A study of seat belt users andnonusers yielded the randomly selected sample data summarized in the given table (based on data from “What Kinds of People Do Not Use Seat Belts?” by Helsing and Comstock, American Journal of Public Health,Vol. 67, No. 11). Test the claim that the amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use. A plausible theory is that people who smoke more are lessconcerned about their health and safety and are therefore less inclined to wear seat belts. Is this theory supported by the sample data?

Number of Cigarettes Smoked per Day

0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Wear Seat Belts

175

20

42

6

Don't Wear Seat Belts

149

17

41

9

Short Answer

Expert verified

The amount of smoking is independent of seatbelt use. There is not enough evidence to support the theory.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The data for the seat belt users and nonusers are provided.

02

Compute the expected frequencies

Theexpected frequency formulais computed as,

\(E = \frac{{\left( {row\;total} \right)\left( {column\;total} \right)}}{{\left( {grand\;total} \right)}}\)

The table with row and column total is represented as,


0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Row Total

Wear Seat Belts

175

20

42

6

243

Don't Wear Seat Belts

149

17

41

9

216

Column Total

324

37

83

15

459

Theexpected frequency tableis represented as,


0

1-14

15-34

35 and over

Wear Seat Belts

171.5294

19.5882

43.9412

7.9412

Don't Wear Seat Belts

152.4706

17.4118

39.0588

7.0588

The expected values are larger than 5. Assume the sampling is done randomly. Thus, the requirements of the test are satisfied.

03

State the null and alternate hypothesis

To test the independence of the two variables, the hypothesis is formulated as follows;

\({H_0}:\)The amount of smoking is independent of seat belt use.

\({H_1}:\)The amount of smoking is dependent on seat belt use.

04

Compute the test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed as,

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}} \\ = \frac{{{{\left( {175 - 171.5294} \right)}^2}}}{{171.5294}} + \frac{{{{\left( {20 - 19.5882} \right)}^2}}}{{19.5882}} + ... + \frac{{{{\left( {9 - 7.0588} \right)}^2}}}{{7.0588}}\\ = 1.3582\end{aligned}\]

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is 1.3582.

05

Compute the degrees of freedom

The degrees of freedom are computed as,

\(\begin{aligned}{c}\left( {r - 1} \right)\left( {c - 1} \right) = \left( {2 - 1} \right)\left( {4 - 1} \right)\\ = 3\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the degrees of freedom are 3.

06

Compute the critical value

From the chi-square table, the critical value corresponding to 3 degrees of freedom and at 0.05 level of significance 7.815.

Therefore, the critical value is 7.815.

The P-value is obtained as 0.7154.

07

State the decision

Since the critical (7.815) is greater than the value of the test statistic (1.3582). In this case, the null hypothesis fails to be rejected.

Therefore, the decision is that we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

08

State the conclusion

There issufficient evidence to support the claimthatthecounts of cigarettes smoked in a day are independent of seat belt use.

Since the two behaviors are independent of each other, there is no evidence to support the theory that more cigarettes smoked by a person makes him or her less concerned of seatbelt use.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

A study of people who refused to answer survey questions provided the randomly selected sample data shown in the table below (based on data from “I Hear You Knocking But You Can’t Come In,” by Fitzgerald and Fuller, Sociological Methods and Research,Vol. 11, No. 1). At the 0.01 significance level, test the claim that the cooperation of

the subject (response or refusal) is independent of the age category. Does any particular age group appear to be particularly uncooperative?

Age


18-21

22-29

30-39

40-49

50-59

60 and over

Responded

73

255

245

136

138

202

Refused

11

20

33

16

27

49

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

If using a 0.05 significance level to test the stated claim, find the number of degrees of freedom.

In a study of high school students at least 16 years of age,

researchers obtained survey results summarized in the accompanying table (based on data from “Texting While Driving and Other Risky Motor Vehicle Behaviors Among U.S. High School Students,” by O’Malley, Shults, and Eaton, Pediatrics,Vol. 131, No. 6). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim of independence between texting while driving and irregular seat belt use. Are those two risky behaviors independent of each other?


Irregular Seat Belt Use?


Yes

No

Texted while driving

1737

2048

No Texting while driving

1945

2775

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Tax Cheating? Frequencies of leading digits from IRS tax files are 152, 89, 63, 48, 39, 40, 28, 25, and 27 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively, based on data from Mark Nigrini, who provides software for Benford data analysis). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the tax entries are legitimate?

Chocolate and Happiness Use the results from part (b) of Cumulative Review Exercise 2 to test the claim that when asked, more than 80% of women say that chocolate makes them happier. Use a 0.01 significance level.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free