Weather-Related Deaths For a recent year, the numbers of weather-related U.S. deaths for each month were 28, 17, 12, 24, 88, 61, 104, 32, 20, 13, 26, 25 (listed in order beginning with January). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that weather-related deaths occur in the different months with the same frequency. Provide an explanation for the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified

There is enough evidence to conclude thatweather-related deaths do not occur with equal frequency in different months.

The months of May, June, and July tend to have a disproportionately higher number of weather-related mortalities, which is due to the increased number of vacations and outdooractivities during those months.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of weather-related deaths that occurred in different months of a year is provided.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is as follows:

Weather-related deaths occur equally frequently in different months.

The alternative hypothesis is as follows:

Weather-related deaths do not occur equally frequently in different months.

It is considered a right-tailed test.

If the test statistic value is greater than the critical value, then the null hypothesis is rejected, otherwise not.

03

Determine the observed and expected frequencies

Let the months of the year be denoted by 1, 2, …..,12 starting from January.

Observed Frequency:

The frequencies provided in the table are the observed frequencies. They are denoted by\(O\).

The following table shows the observed frequency for each month:

\({O_1}\)=28

\({O_2}\)=17

\({O_3}\)=12

\({O_4}\)=24

\({O_5}\)=88

\({O_6}\)=61

\({O_7}\)=104

\({O_8}\)=32

\({O_9}\)=20

\({O_{10}}\)=13

\({O_{11}}\)=26

\({O_{12}}\)=25

Expected Frequency:

It is given that the deaths should occur with the same frequency each month.

Thus, the expected frequency for each of the 12 months is equal to:

\(E = \frac{n}{k}\)

where

n is the total frequency

k is the number of months

Here, the value of n is equal to:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}n = 28 + 17 + ..... + 25\\ = 450\end{aligned}\)

The value of k is equal to 12.

Thus, the expected frequency is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}E = \frac{n}{k}\\ = \frac{{450}}{{12}}\\ = 37.5\end{aligned}\)

The table below shows the necessary calculations:

O

E

O-E

\({\left( {O - E} \right)^2}\)

\(\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\)

28

37.5

-9.5

90.25

2.407

17

37.5

-20.5

420.25

11.207

12

37.5

-25.5

650.25

17.340

24

37.5

-13.5

182.25

4.860

88

37.5

50.5

2550.25

68.007

61

37.5

23.5

552.25

14.727

104

37.5

66.5

4422.25

117.927

32

37.5

-5.5

30.25

0.807

20

37.5

-17.5

306.25

8.167

13

37.5

-24.5

600.25

16.007

26

37.5

-11.5

132.25

3.527

25

37.5

-12.5

156.25

4.167

04

Test statistic

The test statistic is computed as shown below:

\[\begin{aligned}{c}{\chi ^2} = \sum {\frac{{{{\left( {O - E} \right)}^2}}}{E}\;\;\; \sim } {\chi ^2}_{\left( {k - 1} \right)}\\ = 2.407 + 11.207 + ....... + 4.167\\ = 269.1467\end{aligned}\]

Thus, \({\chi ^2} = 269.1467\).

05

Critical vale, p-value and conclusion of the test

The degrees of freedom are computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}df = \left( {k - 1} \right)\\ = \left( {12 - 1} \right)\\ = 11\end{aligned}\)

The critical value of\({\chi ^2}\)for 11 degrees of freedom at 0.01 level of significance for a right-tailed test is equal to 24.725.

The corresponding p-value is approximately equal to 0.000.

Since the value of the test statistic is greater than the critical value and the p-value is less than 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to conclude thatweather-related deaths do not occur equally frequently in different months.

06

Possible Explanation

The months of May, June, and July tend to have a disproportionately higher number of weather-related mortality, which is due to the increased number of vacations and outdoor activities during those months.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The accompanying TI-83/84 Plus calculator display results from thehypothesis test described in Exercise 1. Assume that the hypothesis test requirements are allsatisfied. Identify the test statistic and the P-value (expressed in standard form and rounded tothree decimal places), and then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis.

The table below shows results since 2006 of challenged referee calls in the U.S. Open. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the gender of the tennis player is independent of whether the call is overturned. Do players of either gender appear to be better at challenging calls?

Was the Challenge to the Call Successful?


Yes

No

Men

161

376

Women

68

152

The table below includes results from polygraph (lie detector) experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts (Boise State University) and Gordon H. Barland (Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). In each case, it was known if the subject lied or did not lie, so the table indicates when the polygraph test was correct. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that whether a subject lies is independent of the polygraph test indication. Do the results suggest that polygraphs are effective in distinguishing between truths and lies?

Did the subject Actually Lie?


No (Did Not Lie)

Yes (Lied)

Polygraph test indicates that the subject lied.


15

42

Polygraph test indicates that the subject did not lied.


32

9

Benford’s Law. According to Benford’s law, a variety of different data sets include numbers with leading (first) digits that follow the distribution shown in the table below. In Exercises 21–24, test for goodness-of-fit with the distribution described by Benford’s law.

Leading Digits

Benford's Law: Distributuon of leading digits

1

30.10%

2

17.60%

3

12.50%

4

9.70%

5

7.90%

6

6.70%

7

5.80%

8

5.10%

9

4.60%

Tax Cheating? Frequencies of leading digits from IRS tax files are 152, 89, 63, 48, 39, 40, 28, 25, and 27 (corresponding to the leading digits of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively, based on data from Mark Nigrini, who provides software for Benford data analysis). Using a 0.05 significance level, test for goodness-of-fit with Benford’s law. Does it appear that the tax entries are legitimate?

Cybersecurity The accompanying Statdisk results shown in the margin are obtained from the data given in Exercise 1. What should be concluded when testing the claim that the leading digits have a distribution that fits well with Benford’s law?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free