Forward Grip Reach and Ergonomics When designing cars and aircraft, we must consider the forward grip reach of women. Women have normally distributed forward grip reaches with a mean of 686 mm and a standard deviation of 34 mm (based on anthropometric survey data from Gordon, Churchill, et al.).

a. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by 95% of women, what is the shortest forward grip reach that can access the dashboard?

b. If a car dashboard is positioned so that it can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm, what percentage of women cannot reach the dashboard? Is that percentage too high?

c. Find the probability that 16 randomly selected women have forward grip reaches with a mean greater than 680 mm. Does this result have any effect on the design?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. If 95% of women can reach the car dashboard, the value of the shortest forward grip reach is equal to 630mm.

b. The percentage of women who cannot reach the dashboard is equal to 14.46%.The percentage is too high indicating that a significant portion of women will be left out.

c. The probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is equal to 0.7611.

Only individual women occupy the driver's seat and not a group of 16 women hence this conclusion has no effect on the design.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Forward grip reaches of women are distributed normally with a mean equal to 686 mm and standard deviation equal to 34 mm.

02

Converting area to a value

a.

It is given that 95% can reach the dashboard.

Let\({z_p}\)denote the z-score of the minimum value of the forward grip reach.

This implies the following expression:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {z \ge {z_p}} \right) = 0.95\\1 - P\left( {z < {z_p}} \right) = 0.95\\P\left( {z < {z_p}} \right) = 0.05\end{aligned}\)

Thus, the value of the z-score for an area under the curve equal to 0.05 is equal to -1.645.

It is known that:

\(\begin{aligned}{l}\mu = 686\;mm\\\sigma = 34\;mm\end{aligned}\)

Let X denote the shortest forward grip reach.

To compute the value of the shortest forward grip reach, the following calculations are done:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}z = \frac{{x - \mu }}{\sigma }\\ - 1.645 = \frac{{x - 686}}{{34}}\\x = \left( { - 1.645} \right)34 + 686\\ = 630.07\\ \approx 630\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, if 95% of women can reach the car dashboard, the value of the shortest forward grip reach is equal to 630mm.

03

Probability

b.

Let X denote the forward grip reach value.

The car dashboard can be reached by women with a grip reach greater than 650 mm.

Therefore, women with forward grip reach less than 650 mm cannot reach the dashboard.

The proportion of women who cannot reach the dashboard is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {X < 650} \right) = P\left( {\frac{{X - \mu }}{\sigma } < \frac{{650 - \mu }}{\sigma }} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z < \frac{{650 - 686}}{{34}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z < - 1.06} \right)\\ = 1 - P\left( {Z < 1.06} \right)\end{aligned}\)

\(\begin{aligned}{c} = 1 - 0.8554\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\left( {\therefore {\rm{From}}\;{\rm{Standard}}\;{\rm{normal}}\;{\rm{table}}} \right)\\ = 0.1446\\ = 14.46\% \end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the percentage of women who cannot reach the dashboard is equal to 14.46%.

The percentage is too high, indicating that a significant portion of women will be left out.

04

Sampling distribution of sample mean

c.

If the forward grip reach value denoted by X follows normal distribution with mean\(\left( \mu \right)\)and standard deviation\(\left( \sigma \right)\), then the mean forward grip reach value follows normal distribution with mean\(\left( \mu \right)\)and standard deviation\(\left( {\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}} \right)\).

Here, n is given to be equal to 16.

The probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is computed below:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {\bar X > 680} \right) = P\left( {\frac{{\bar X > \mu }}{{\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}}} > \frac{{680 - \mu }}{{\frac{\sigma }{{\sqrt n }}}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z > \frac{{680 - 686}}{{\frac{{34}}{{\sqrt {16} }}}}} \right)\\ = P\left( {Z > - 0.71} \right)\end{aligned}\)

Simplifying this further, the following value is obtained using the standard normal table:

\(\begin{aligned}{c}P\left( {Z > - 0.71} \right) = P\left( {Z < 0.71} \right)\\ = 0.7611\end{aligned}\)

Therefore, the probability of selecting 16 women with a mean forward grip reach value greater than 680 mm is equal to 0.7611.

Only individual women occupy the driver's seat and not a group of 16 women; hence this conclusion has no effect on the design.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Weather-Related Deaths For a recent year, the numbers of weather-related U.S. deaths for each month were 28, 17, 12, 24, 88, 61, 104, 32, 20, 13, 26, 25 (listed in order beginning with January). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that weather-related deaths occur in the different months with the same frequency. Provide an explanation for the result.

Equivalent Tests A\({\chi ^2}\)test involving a 2\( \times \)2 table is equivalent to the test for the differencebetween two proportions, as described in Section 9-1. Using the claim and table inExercise 9 “Four Quarters the Same as $1?” verify that the\({\chi ^2}\)test statistic and the zteststatistic (found from the test of equality of two proportions) are related as follows:\({z^2}\)=\({\chi ^2}\).

Also show that the critical values have that same relationship.

Refer to the data given in Exercise 1 and assume that the requirements are all satisfied and we want to conduct a hypothesis test of independence using the methods of this section. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses.

Cybersecurity The table below lists leading digits of 317 inter-arrival Internet traffic times for a computer, along with the frequencies of leading digits expected with Benford’s law (from Table 11-1 in the Chapter Problem).

a. Identify the notation used for observed and expected values.

b. Identify the observed and expected values for the leading digit of 2.

c. Use the results from part (b) to find the contribution to the\({\chi ^2}\)test statistic from the category representing the leading digit of 2.

Leading Digit

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Benford’s

Law

30.1%

17.6%

12.5%

9.7%

7.9%

6.7%

5.8%

5.1%

4.6%

Leading Digits

of Inter-Arrival

Traffic Times

76

62

29

33

19

27

28

21

22

Exercises 1–5 refer to the sample data in the following table, which summarizes the last digits of the heights (cm) of 300 randomly selected subjects (from Data Set 1 “Body Data” in Appendix B). Assume that we want to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the data are from a population having the property that the last digits are all equally likely.

Last Digit

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Frequency

30

35

24

25

35

36

37

27

27

24

If using a 0.05 significance level to test the stated claim, find the number of degrees of freedom.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free