Refer to Exercise 9.20. Explain what each of the following would mean.

a. Type I error

b. Type II error

c. Correct decision

Now suppose that the results of carrying out the hypothesis test lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. Classify that conclusion by error type or as a correct decision if in fact the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers

d. equals the normal resting heart rate of 72 bpm.

e. exceeds the normal resting heart rate of 72 bpm.

Short Answer

Expert verified

(a) Rejecting a Null Hypothesis, when it is true.

(b) Rejecting a Null Hypothesis, when (H)is false.

(c) If the true null hypothesis is not rejected or a false null hypothesis is rejected.

(d) Type I error.

(e) Correct Decision.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Given

H0The mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm).

H0:μ=72bpm

Ha: The mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds the normal resting heart rate

exceeds 72 (bpm).

Versus,

Ha:μ>72bpm

02

Part (a) Type one error

The type I error is defined as rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true, according to the definition. While it is true that the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers is equal to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), the sampling results lead to the conclusion that the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), resulting in the null hypothesis being rejected.

03

Part( b) Type ii error

When the null hypothesis (H) is untrue, the type II error is defined as failing to reject it. If μ=72bpmis not to be rejected, a type II error occurs, but the sample data fail to infer that the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers is equal to the typical resting heart rate of 72. (bpm).

04

Part (c) Correct decision

If neither the true null hypothesis nor the false null hypothesis is rejected, the decision is correct. In this case, the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers is equal to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), and the sampling results do not lead to rejection, so the correct decision is; or the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), and the sampling results lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis of 72 bpm.

05

Part (d) Classifying the error type

Here the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers equals to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), and the results of a hypothesis test lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. We need to classify the decision as an error type or a correct decision.

As a sampling result we obtain the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers equals to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), and we are rejecting the null hypothesis that the mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm). that is the true null hypothesis rejected, So we are committing type 1 error.

06

Part (e) Classifying the error type

Mean post-work heart rate of casting workers exceeds to the normal resting heart rate of 72 (bpm), and the results of a hypothesis test lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. We need to classify the decision as an error type or a correct decision.

We are not rejecting the null hypothesis of μ=16.7months, where we obtain as a sampling result that mean length of imprisonment for motor-vehicle-theft offenders in differs from national mean of 16.7 months. Therefore, our decision is a correct decision.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Critical Values. In Exercises 21–24, refer to the information in the given exercise and do the following.

a. Find the critical value(s).

b. Using a significance level of = 0.05, should we reject H0or should we fail to reject H0?

Exercise 17

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is the Diet Practical? When 40 people used the Weight Watchers diet for one year, their mean weight loss was 3.0 lb and the standard deviation was 4.9 lb (based on data from “Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Reduction,” by Dansinger et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 293, No. 1). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean weight loss is greater than 0. Based on these results, does the diet appear to have statistical significance? Does the diet appear to have practical significance?

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Lie Detectors Trials in an experiment with a polygraph yield 98 results that include 24 cases of wrong results and 74 cases of correct results (based on data from experiments conducted by researchers Charles R. Honts of Boise State University and Gordon H. Barland of the Department of Defense Polygraph Institute). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that such polygraph results are correct less than 80% of the time. Based on the results, should polygraph test results be prohibited as evidence in trials?

Interpreting Power Chantix (varenicline) tablets are used as an aid to help people stop smoking. In a clinical trial, 129 subjects were treated with Chantix twice a day for 12 weeks, and 16 subjects experienced abdominal pain (based on data from Pfizer, Inc.). If someone claims that more than 8% of Chantix users experience abdominal pain, that claim is supported with a hypothesis test conducted with a 0.05 significance level. Using 0.18 as an alternative value of p, the power of the test is 0.96. Interpret this value of the power of the test.

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement?

774 649 1210 546 431 612

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free