Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Garlic for Reducing Cholesterol In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering cholesterol, 49 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment. The changes (before minus after) in their levels of LDL cholesterol (in mg>dL) have a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 21.0 (based on data from “Effect of Raw Garlic vs Commercial Garlic Supplements on Plasma Lipid Concentrations in Adults with Moderate Hypercholesterolemia,” by Gardner et al., Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 167, No. 4). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that with garlic treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0. What do the results suggest about the effectiveness of the garlic treatment?

Short Answer

Expert verified

The hypotheses are as follows.

H0:μ=0H1:μ>0

The test statistic is 0.133.

The critical value is 1.677.

The hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

There is insufficient evidence to support the claim that the population mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0.

The garlic treatment is not effective in reducing the LDL level.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

A sample is taken for the changes in the level of LDL cholesterol from 49 subjects with a mean of 0.4 and a standard deviation of 21.0.

It is required to test the claim that the population mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0 with a 0.05 level of significance.

02

Check the requirements

The requirements for the test are verified, as shown below.

  1. The sample, satisfies the condition of a simple random sampling, as the sample is randomly collected from the change in LDL cholesterol.
  2. The sample size of 49 is greater than 30. Thus, there is no need to check for normality of the sample, as the condition for the sample size is satisfied.

As the population standard deviation is unknown, the t-test applies.

03

State the hypotheses 

The null hypothesis H0represents the population mean change in LDL cholesterol, which is less than or equal to 0. As the original claim is strictly greater than 0, the alternate hypothesis H1represents the population mean change in the LDL cholesterol, which is greater than 0.

Let μbe the population mean change in LDL cholesterol.

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H0:μ0H1:μ>0

The test is one-tailed.

04

State the critical value

The degree of freedom is obtained by using the formula df=n-1, where . So,

df=49-1=48

The critical value can be obtained using the t-distribution table with 48 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05.

From the t-table, the value is obtained as 1.677, corresponding to the row with a value of 48 and column 0.05 (one tail).

Thus, the critical value is 1.677 t0.05.

05

Compute the observed test statistic

Apply the t-test to compute the test statistic using the formula t=x¯-μsn.

Substitute the respective value in the above formula and simplify.

t=0.4-02149=0.43=0.133

.

06

State the decision rule 

Reject the null hypothesis when the absolute value of the observed test statistic is greater than the critical value. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

In this case,

t=0.133=0.133<1.677t0.05

The absolute value of the observed test statistic is less than the critical value. This implies that the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

07

Conclusion

As the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected, it can be concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean change in the LDL cholesterol is greater than 0.

As the change is not greater than 0, the garlic treatment may not be effective in lowering the LDL cholesterol level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Medical Malpractice In a study of 1228 randomly selected medical malpractice lawsuits, it was found that 856 of them were dropped or dismissed (based on data from the Physicians Insurers Association of America). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that most medical malpractice lawsuits are dropped or dismissed. Should this be comforting to physicians?

Technology. In Exercises 9–12, test the given claim by using the display provided from technology. Use a 0.05 significance level. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Tornadoes Data Set 22 “Tornadoes” in Appendix B includes data from 500 random tornadoes. The accompanying StatCrunch display results from using the tornado lengths (miles) to test the claim that the mean tornado length is greater than 2.5 miles.

The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical trial, results could be analysed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of p>0.5, which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than 0.5. If you have an interest in establishing the success of the method, which of the following P-values would you prefer: 0.999, 0.5, 0.95, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001? Why?

Finding P-values. In Exercises 5–8, either use technology to find the P-value or use Table A-3 to find a range of values for the P-value Body Temperatures The claim is that for 12 am body temperatures, the mean is μ<98.6°F.The sample size is n = 4 and the test statistic is t = -2.503.

P-Values. In Exercises 17–20, do the following:

a. Identify the hypothesis test as being two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed.

b. Find the P-value. (See Figure 8-3 on page 364.)

c. Using a significance level of α = 0.05, should we reject H0or should we fail to reject H0?

The test statistic of z = -2.50 is obtained when testing the claim that p<0.75

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free