Politics A county clerk in Essex County, New Jersey, selected candidates for positions on election ballots. Democrats were selected first in 40 of 41 ballots. Because he was supposed to use a method of random selection, Republicans claimed that instead of using randomness, he used a method that favored Democrats. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the ballot selection method favors Democrats.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The decision is to reject the hypotheses at a 0.01 level of significance, and hence, there is sufficient evidence to say that the ballot selection method favors the Democrats.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

The number of times Democrats were selected first out of 41 ballots is 40.

The significance level is 0.01.

The claim requires testing if the ballot selection favors Democrats.

02

State the hypotheses

Let p be the proportion of selections that favors the Democrats.

Null hypothesis: The ballot selection method does not support the Democrats.

Alternative hypothesis: The ballot selection method favors the Democrats.

Mathematically,

H0:p=0.5H1:p>0.5

03

Compute the test statistic

In testing the population proportion based on the sample proportion, the z-test is used.

The sample proportion is given as follows.

p^=4041=0.9756

From the given information,

p=0.5q=1-p=1-0.5=0.5

The test statistic is as follows.

z=p^-ppqn=0.9756-0.50.5×0.541=6.0908

Thus, the test statistic is 6.09.

04

Obtain the critical value

The critical value for the right-tailed test is expressed as follows.

PZ>zα=αPZ>z0.01=0.01

From the z-table, the critical value for a one-tailed test with a 0.01 significance level is obtained as 2.33 (corresponding to rows 2.3 and 0.03).

05

State the decision rule

If the test statistic is greater than the critical value, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

The test statistic value of 6.09 is greater than 2.33. Therefore, reject .

Thus, there is significant evidence to support the claim that the ballot selection method favors the Democrats.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Using Technology. In Exercises 5–8, identify the indicated values or interpret the given display. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section. Use α= 0.05 significance level and answer the following:

a. Is the test two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed?

b. What is the test statistic?

c. What is the P-value?

d. What is the null hypothesis, and what do you conclude about it?

e. What is the final conclusion?

Cell Phone Ownership A Pew Research Center poll of 2076 randomly selected adults showed that 91% of them own cell phones. The following Minitab display results from a test of the claim that 92% of adults own cell phones.

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25–28, use a significance level of = 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: More than 58% of adults would erase all of their personal information online if they could. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.3257.

The Ericsson method is one of several methods claimed to increase the likelihood of a baby girl. In a clinical trial, results could be analysed with a formal hypothesis test with the alternative hypothesis of p>0.5, which corresponds to the claim that the method increases the likelihood of having a girl, so that the proportion of girls is greater than 0.5. If you have an interest in establishing the success of the method, which of the following P-values would you prefer: 0.999, 0.5, 0.95, 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001? Why?

Vitamin C and Aspirin A bottle contains a label stating that it contains Spring Valley pills with 500 mg of vitamin C, and another bottle contains a label stating that it contains Bayer pills with 325 mg of aspirin. When testing claims about the mean contents of the pills, which would have more serious implications: rejection of the Spring Valley vitamin C claim or rejection of the Bayer aspirin claim? Is it wise to use the same significance level for hypothesis tests about the mean amount of vitamin C and the mean amount of aspirin?

Finding Critical t Values When finding critical values, we often need significance levels other than those available in Table A-3. Some computer programs approximate critical t values by calculating t=df×eA2/df-1where df = n-1, e = 2.718, A=z8×df+3/8×df+1, and z is the critical z score. Use this approximation to find the critical t score for Exercise 12 “Tornadoes,” using a significance level of 0.05. Compare the results to the critical t score of 1.648 found from technology. Does this approximation appear to work reasonably well?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free