Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Cell Phones and Cancer In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.000340.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is not equal to 0.000340.

Test statistic: -0.667

Critical value: 2.807

P-value: 0.5047

The null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer of the brain or nervous system is not equal to 0.0340%.

As the results indicate that the proportion of cell phone users and non-cell phone users who develop cancer is roughly the same, cell phone users should not be concerned.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 420095 cell phone users, 135 develop cancer of the brain or nervous system. It is claimed that the rate at which cell phone users develop cancer is not equal to 0.0340%.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.0340%.

H0:p=0.000340

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is not equal to 0.0340%.

H1:p0.000340

The test is two-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion, and population proportion

The sample size is equal to n=420095.

The sample proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is computed below.

p^=NumberofuserswhodevelopedcancerSampleSize=135420095=0.000321

The population proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.000340.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

z=p^-ppqn=0.000321-0.0003400.0003401-0.000340420095=-0.667

Thus, z=-0.667.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at for a two-tailed test is equal to 2.807.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of -0.667 is equal to 0.5047.

Asthe p-value is greater than 0.005, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer of the brain or nervous system is not equal to 0.0340%.

As the results suggest that the proportion of cell phone users, as well as non-cell phone users who develop cancer, is approximately the same, cell phone users should not be concerned.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Testing Effectiveness of Nicotine Patches In one study of smokers who tried to quit smoking with nicotine patch therapy, 39 were smoking one year after the treatment and 32 were not smoking one year after the treatment (based on data from “High-Dose Nicotine Patch Therapy,” by Dale et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 274, No. 17). Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that among smokers who try to quit with nicotine patch therapy, the majority are smoking one year after the treatment. Do these results suggest that the nicotine patch therapy is not effective?

Technology. In Exercises 9–12, test the given claim by using the display provided from technology. Use a 0.05 significance level. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Body Temperatures Data Set 3 “Body Temperatures” in Appendix B includes 93 body temperatures measured at 12 ²³ on day 1 of a study, and the accompanying XLSTAT display results from using those data to test the claim that the mean body temperature is equal to 98.6°F. Conduct the hypothesis test using these results.

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25–28, use a significance level of α = 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: The standard deviation of pulse rates of adult males is more than 11 bpm. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.3045.

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Car Booster Seats The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration conducted crash tests of child booster seats for cars. Listed below are results from those tests, with the measurements given in hic (standard head injury condition units). The safety requirement is that the hic measurement should be less than 1000 hic. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the sample is from a population with a mean less than 1000 hic. Do the results suggest that all of the child booster seats meet the specified requirement?

774 649 1210 546 431 612

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of adults who use the internet is greater than 0.87.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free