Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Cell Phones and Cancer In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Null hypothesis: The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.000340.

Alternative hypothesis: The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is not equal to 0.000340.

Test statistic: -0.667

Critical value: 2.807

P-value: 0.5047

The null hypothesis is failed to reject.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer of the brain or nervous system is not equal to 0.0340%.

Asthe results indicate that the proportion of cell phone users and non-cell phone users who develop cancer is roughly the same, cell phone users should not be concerned.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Out of 420095 cell phone users, 135 develop cancer of the brain or nervous system. It is claimed that the rate at which cell phone users develop cancer is not equal to 0.0340%.

02

Hypotheses

The null hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.0340%.

\({H_0}:p = 0.000340\).

The alternative hypothesis is written as follows.

The proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is not equal to 0.0340%.

\[{H_1}:p \ne 0.000340\].

The test is two-tailed.

03

Sample size, sample proportion,and population proportion

The sample size is equal to n=420095.

The sample proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer is computed below.

\[\begin{array}{c}\hat p = \frac{{{\rm{Number}}\;{\rm{of}}\;{\rm{users}}\;{\rm{who}}\;{\rm{developed}}\;{\rm{cancer}}}}{{{\rm{Sample}}\;{\rm{Size}}}}\\ = \frac{{135}}{{420095}}\\ = 0.000321\end{array}\]

The population proportion ofcell phone users who develop cancer is equal to 0.000340.

04

Test statistic

The value of the test statistic is computed below.

\(\begin{array}{c}z = \frac{{\hat p - p}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{pq}}{n}} }}\\ = \frac{{0.000321 - 0.000340}}{{\sqrt {\frac{{0.000340\left( {1 - 0.000340} \right)}}{{420095}}} }}\\ = - 0.667\end{array}\).

Thus, z=-0.667.

05

Critical value and p-value

Referring to the standard normal table, the critical value of z at\(\alpha = 0.005\)for a two-tailed test is equal to 2.807.

Referring to the standard normal table, the p-value for the test statistic value of -0.667 is equal to 0.5047.

Asthe p-value is greater than 0.005, the null hypothesis is failed to reject.

06

Conclusion of the test

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of cell phone users who develop cancer of the brain or nervous system is not equal to 0.0340%.

Asthe results suggest that the proportion of cell phone users, as well as non-cell phone users who develop cancer, is approximately the same, cell phone users should not be concerned.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Estimates and Hypothesis Tests Data Set 3 “Body Temperatures” in Appendix B includes sample body temperatures. We could use methods of Chapter 7 for making an estimate, or we could use those values to test the common belief that the mean body temperature is 98.6°F. What is the difference between estimating and hypothesis testing?

Type I and Type II Errors. In Exercises 29–32, provide statements that identify the type I error and the type II error that correspond to the given claim. (Although conclusions are usually expressed in verbal form, the answers here can be expressed with statements that include symbolic expressions such as p = 0.1.).

The proportion of people with blue eyes is equal to 0.35.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Survey Return Rate In a study of cell phone use and brain hemispheric dominance, an Internet survey was e-mailed to 5000 subjects randomly selected from an online group involved with ears. 717 surveys were returned. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the return rate is less than 15%.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Touch Therapy When she was 9 years of age, Emily Rosa did a science fair experiment in which she tested professional touch therapists to see if they could sense her energy field. She flipped a coin to select either her right hand or her left hand, and then she asked the therapists to identify the selected hand by placing their hand just under Emily’s hand without seeing it and without touching it. Among 280 trials, the touch therapists were correct 123 times (based on data in “A Close Look at Therapeutic Touch,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 279, No. 13). Use a 0.10 significance level to test the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses. Do the results suggest that touch therapists are effective?

Confidence interval Assume that we will use the sample data from Exercise 1 “Video Games” with a 0.05 significance level in a test of the claim that the population mean is greater than 90 sec. If we want to construct a confidence interval to be used for testing the claim, what confidence level should be used for the confidence interval? If the confidence interval is found to be 21.1 sec < μ< 191.4 sec, what should we conclude about the claim?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free