Cans of coke for the sample data from exercise 1, we get “P-value<0.01” when testing the claim that the new filling process results in volumes with the same standard deviation of 0.115 oz.

  1. What should we conclude about the null hypothesis?
  2. What should we conclude about the original claims?
  3. What do these results suggest about the new filling process?

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. The null hypothesis is rejected ata0.01 level of significance.

b. There is notsufficient evidence to support the null hypothesis.

c. The result suggests that the variation in the volume is different from 0.115 oz, which implies the volume is not consistent.

Step by step solution

01

Step-1: Given information

Refer to the data in exercise 1 for the volume of the new filling process.

02

Step-2: State the hypotheses

a.

Let σbe the population standard deviation of the volumes of new filling processes.

H0:σ=0.115H1:σ0.115

03

Step-3: State the decision

b.

The decision rule statesif the p-value is lesser than 0.01, the null hypothesis is rejected. Otherwise, the null hypothesis is failed to be rejected.

The p-value is lesser than 0.01. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected. Hence, it can be concluded that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim.

04

Step-4: Compute the test statistic

c.

The result suggests that the volume is inconsistent throughout all cans from the new filling process. Thus, the standard deviation is different from 0.115 oz.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25–28, use a significance level of α= 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0 or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: The mean pulse rate (in beats per minute) of adult males is 72 bpm. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.0095.

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Is the Diet Practical? When 40 people used the Weight Watchers diet for one year, their mean weight loss was 3.0 lb and the standard deviation was 4.9 lb (based on data from “Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets for Weight Loss and Heart Disease Reduction,” by Dansinger et al., Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 293, No. 1). Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the mean weight loss is greater than 0. Based on these results, does the diet appear to have statistical significance? Does the diet appear to have practical significance?

Final Conclusions. In Exercises 25–28, use a significance level of α = 0.05 and use the given information for the following:

a. State a conclusion about the null hypothesis. (Reject H0or fail to reject H0.)

b. Without using technical terms or symbols, state a final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Original claim: The standard deviation of pulse rates of adult males is more than 11 bpm. The hypothesis test results in a P-value of 0.3045.

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Heights of Supermodels Listed below are the heights (cm) for the simple random sample of female supermodels Lima, Bundchen, Ambrosio, Ebanks, Iman, Rubik, Kurkova, Kerr,Kroes, Swanepoel, Prinsloo, Hosk, Kloss, Robinson, Heatherton, and Refaeli. Use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that supermodels have heights with a mean that is greater than the mean height of 162 cm for women in the general population. Given that there are only 16 heights represented, can we really conclude that supermodels are taller than the typical woman?

178 177 176 174 175 178 175 178 178 177 180 176 180 178 180 176

Critical Values. In Exercises 21–24, refer to the information in the given exercise and do the following.

a. Find the critical value(s).

b. Using a significance level of = 0.05, should we reject H0or should we fail to reject H0?

Exercise 17

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free