Confidence Interval for Lightning Deaths Use the sample values given in Cumulative Review Exercise 1 to construct a 99% confidence interval estimate of the population mean. Assume that the population has a normal distribution. Write a brief statement that interprets the confidence interval.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The 99% confidence interval is equal to (29.2 deaths, 45.0 deaths).

There is 99% confidence that the population’s mean number of deaths due to lightning strikes will fall in the interval (29.2 deaths, 45.0 deaths).

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Data are given on the number of deaths that have occurred due to lightning strikes for a series of 14 consecutive years.

02

Confidence interval

The following formula is used to compute the confidence interval estimate of the population mean:

CI=x¯-E,x¯+E where

x¯ is the sample mean number of deaths

E is the margin of error

The formula to compute the value of E is shown below:

E=tα2sn

Here, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

tα2 is the value of the t-distribution at α2 level of significance with n-1 degrees of freedom.

03

Sample size, sample mean, and sample standard deviation

The sample size (n) is equal to.

The sample mean is computed below:

x¯=51+44+........+2314=37.1

The sample standard deviation is computed below:

s=i=1n(xi-x¯)2n-1=51-37.12+44-37.12+.......+23-37.1214-1=9.8

04

Value of   tα2

The confidence level is given as equal to 99%. Thus, the corresponding value of the level of significance α is equal to 0.01.

The value of the degrees of freedom is computed below:

df=n-1=14-1=13

The value of with 13 degrees of freedom is equal to 3.0123.

05

Calculation of confidence interval

The margin of error is equal to:

E=tα2sn=3.01239.814=7.8897

The 99% confidence interval estimate of the population mean is equal to

CI=x¯-E,x¯+E=37.1-7.8897,37.1+7.8897=29.2,45.0

Thus, the 99% confidence interval estimate of the population mean is equal to (29.2 deaths, 45.0 deaths).

There is 99% confidence that the population’s mean number of deaths due to lightning strikes will lie between the values 29.2 and 45.0.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with Vaia!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing Hypotheses. In Exercises 13–24, assume that a simple random sample has been selected and test the given claim. Unless specified by your instructor, use either the P-value method or the critical value method for testing hypotheses. Identify the null and alternative hypotheses, test statistic, P-value (or range of P-values), or critical value(s), and state the final conclusion that addresses the original claim.

Got a Minute? Students of the author estimated the length of one minute without reference to a watch or clock, and the times (seconds) are listed below. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that these times are from a population with a mean equal to 60 seconds. Does it appear that students are reasonably good at estimating one minute?

69 81 39 65 42 21 60 63 66 48 64 70 96 91 65

Finding Critical t Values When finding critical values, we often need significance levels other than those available in Table A-3. Some computer programs approximate critical t values by calculating t=df×eA2/df-1where df = n-1, e = 2.718, A=z8×df+3/8×df+1, and z is the critical z score. Use this approximation to find the critical t score for Exercise 12 “Tornadoes,” using a significance level of 0.05. Compare the results to the critical t score of 1.648 found from technology. Does this approximation appear to work reasonably well?

Using Technology. In Exercises 5–8, identify the indicated values or interpret the given display. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section. Use α= 0.05 significance level and answer the following:

a. Is the test two-tailed, left-tailed, or right-tailed?

b. What is the test statistic?

c. What is the P-value?

d. What is the null hypothesis, and what do you conclude about it?

e. What is the final conclusion?

Cell Phone Ownership A Pew Research Center poll of 2076 randomly selected adults showed that 91% of them own cell phones. The following Minitab display results from a test of the claim that 92% of adults own cell phones.

Testing Claims About Proportions. In Exercises 9–32, test the given claim. Identify the null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, test statistic, P-value, or critical value(s), then state the conclusion about the null hypothesis, as well as the final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the P-value method unless your instructor specifies otherwise. Use the normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution, as described in Part 1 of this section.

Cell Phones and Cancer In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today). Test the claim of a somewhat common belief that such cancers are affected by cell phone use. That is, test the claim that cell phone users develop cancer of the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% for people who do not use cell phones. Because this issue has such great importance, use a 0.005 significance level. Based on these results, should cell phone users be concerned about cancer of the brain or nervous system?

In Exercises 9–12, refer to the exercise identified. Make subjective estimates to decide whether results are significantly low or significantly high, then state a conclusion about the original claim. For example, if the claim is that a coin favours heads and sample results consist of 11 heads in 20 flips, conclude that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the coin favours heads (because it is easy to get 11 heads in 20 flips by chance with a fair coin).

Exercise 7 “Pulse Rates”

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.

Sign-up for free